Why dont they just put the Super 6 on hold for a year?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • boxasmash
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Aug 2008
    • 7039
    • 222
    • 63
    • 14,591

    #1

    Why dont they just put the Super 6 on hold for a year?

    They can keep Ward, Green, Froch and Abraham contracted and fighting tune ups or something and wait until Dirrell and Kessler are better next year.
  • DARKSEID
    Banned
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Jan 2010
    • 17578
    • 962
    • 512
    • 43,940

    #2
    Originally posted by boxasmash
    They can keep Ward, Green, Froch and Abraham contracted and fighting tune ups or something and wait until Dirrell and Kessler are better next year.
    That makes too much sense.. and since when have the moves in boxing made any sense?

    Comment

    • Sweet Jesus
      Banned
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Dec 2009
      • 11512
      • 568
      • 332
      • 13,576

      #3
      Because they don't have that kind of power. Do you think boxers are ******?

      Comment

      • Jack Napier
        Whores on Our Cul de Sac
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • May 2010
        • 8668
        • 812
        • 424
        • 16,030

        #4
        network learn a lesson and just do 8 man single elimination next time

        Comment

        • boxasmash
          Undisputed Champion
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Aug 2008
          • 7039
          • 222
          • 63
          • 14,591

          #5
          Originally posted by Sweet Jesus
          Because they don't have that kind of power. Do you think boxers are ******?
          Besides Ward who can really leave Showtime and pick up an HBO contract out of those guys?

          Comment

          Working...
          TOP