fighters who got robbed of a RIGHTFUL KO victory

[The Dreamer]

Brandon Rios was robbed of an inevitable KO when Anthony Peterson decided he was gonna get himself DQ'd

[edgarg]

Herman Ngoudjo Versus Emmanuel Augustus

I think Augustus should have had a KO in this fight, in fact i was certain it had happened, and was astonished that the decision was a loss to Augustus by UD. the fight should have been stopped for sure in that 12th rd. It was robbery.

In another bout, Wladimir Klitschko should have had a TKO against Lamon Brewster in the 4th rd of their fight in which Klitschko himself lost in the fifth.

[Xyei]

Roy Jones Jr v Montell Griffin

King Arthur Abraham v Andre "the nominated for Best Actress for the Academy Award" Dirrell

Andrade v Bute

Juergen Braehmer v Dmitry Sukhotsky (should have been ruled a rightful TKO victory for Sukhotsky)

if you have seen the fight u know what I mean


can you name me some more?

Why should Abraham get a KO victory for hitting a man when he was down? Regardless of weather you think Dirrell was acting or not, hitting a man when he is down shouldn't be awarded.

Martinez should have a KO victory over Cintron.

Andrade vs. Bute 1 has to be one of the worst I've ever seen though.

[edgarg]

Foul or not a foul. That's the question my man.

The question is not whether any "foul" was a foul, Its a question of whether the foul was SERIOUS enough to warrant disqualification. I don't think Jones's was, he didn't hurt the guy at all.

[SirTomJones]

Calzaghe V Hopkins


Hopkins was made to hold his nuts like he was back in prison.

Calzaghe should have got the TkO.

[edgarg]

much like how Pernell would do a complete crouch to avoid punches, Roy thought Griffin was doing the same thing...he should have had just a warning...unintentional foul

Exactly; you said it better than I did, further on. The question is NOT if it's a fould, but if it's serious to warrant DQ, and all fouls DO NOT.