Michael Spinks Vs Michael Nunn

**Parodius** · 08-06-2005, 03:46 PM

Spinks was an heavyweight in 1989, Nunn was a middleweight in 1989. Nunn was not a good light heavyweight, he became a light heavyweight when he was washed up. Spinks was one of the best Light Heavyweights. They could've never had this fight in 1989. The light heavyweight Spinks would've destroyed the light heavyweight Nunn.

**JUYJUY** · 08-06-2005, 03:50 PM

Spinks was a natural Light-Heavy and Nunn was a natual Middle, Spinks would of had to lose around seven lbs and Nunn would of had to gain around eight lbs.

**wmute** · 08-06-2005, 05:07 PM

Originally posted by JUYJUY

Spinks was a natural Light-Heavy and Nunn was a natual Middle, Spinks would of had to lose around seven lbs and Nunn would of had to gain around eight lbs.

the last time spinks fought at 175 was in 85, so in 89, he would have serious trouble making 168 in 89

**jabsRstiff** · 08-08-2005, 06:35 AM

WORST FANTASY MATCHUP EVER !

Spinks.....at 168 ? Spinks was a large Lt.Heavyweight...& a GREAT one at that. He'd have been wasted by dropping down to 168.

An absurd, nonsensical matchup.

From the forum's most absurd & nonsensical poster.

**JUYJUY** · 08-08-2005, 06:37 AM

Originally posted by jabsRstiff

From the forum's most absurd & nonsensical poster.

Your just a Brit-hater

**jabsRstiff** · 08-08-2005, 07:06 AM

Originally posted by JUYJUY

Your just a Brit-hater

I don't hate you. I feel sorry for you, invalid.

**JUYJUY** · 08-08-2005, 07:08 AM

This one's a little better, click here: http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/sh...ad.php?t=42808

**Kid_Diamond** · 08-08-2005, 09:16 AM

..d..r..a..w..

**JUYJUY** · 08-08-2005, 09:20 AM

Somebody remove jabsRstiff from this forum, he's scum of the earth and his behaviour and disrespectfulness to boxers just should not be tolerated any longer.

Michael Spinks Vs Michael Nunn