How the hell can you DQ Trinidad for kicking Vargas' ass? Maybe he was beating Vargas up too bad? Does that warrant a DQ, I don't know
Should Trinidad have been DQ'd against Vargas?
Collapse
-
-
you Mexicans have more excuses than Golden Boy PromotionsOriginally posted by Cali_RobYou took the words right out of my mouth. I never counted that as a loss for Vargas cause Tito fought dirty in that fight. Vargas should of won either KOing him if he didnt get low blowed every time he got something going or by DQ.Comment
-
Castillo was the one low blowing Corrales, *******Originally posted by Zab Super Judahshould Corrales be DQ'd vs CASTILLO?Comment
-
you should not count it as a loss but as a retirement fight because tito ended his career that night vargas has never been the same since he is not even half of what he was and it was not the low blows that did that to him .Originally posted by Cali_RobYou took the words right out of my mouth. I never counted that as a loss for Vargas cause Tito fought dirty in that fight. Vargas should of won either KOing him if he didnt get low blowed every time he got something going or by DQ.Comment
-
Nope. Whether or not the 2nd time was an accident or on purpose he got a deduction, and had he done it again he would have been DQ'd. The judge did what he was supposed to do.Originally posted by Zab Super Judahshould Corrales be DQ'd vs CASTILLO?
As far as Vargas and Trinidad goes... I think Tito would've won the fight regardless of the lowblows or not. I think giving a fighter a DQ because of lowblows is always a touchy subject since it's one of the things that can occur on accident during a bout as well... It's not as clear cut as biting somebody's ear.Comment
-
my point is that trinidad should not be DQ's for lowblows..he had points deducted..same as corrales should not be DQ's because he got deducted for the mouthpiece..both were probably intentional..DUmbassOriginally posted by DiegoFuegoCastillo was the one low blowing Corrales, *******Comment
-
From Nicaragua..just in case someone said i am biching cuz i am mexican
~~~~~~
1--Whether corrales should have or not been DQ..it one:has nothing to do with Vargas and two:was a ***** ass move anyway,whether called smart or a gameplan..it was still corrales being a *****
2--This is hard...Tito was acting like a girl true in that fight and i would be tempted to say he should have ben DQ..but wasnt he being hit by a man on Steriod..so tis ironic to call tito the cheater here..so in my opinion of it would have a been a Vargas not on any juice (which who knows if he woudl have been as good) than yes Tito shoudl have been DQ...there just so much unfairness from both sides. But liek other stated..without the Low Blow..it looked like tito was going down.Comment
-
Extactly, Mexicans ***** like a bunch of sissys about everything non Mexican, is there a fight they dont have anything to cry about? Chavez/Taylor, Trinidad/DLH/Vargas, Castillo/Mayweather/Corrales, barrera/Pacman/Morales/JMM, Margarito/Santos ect some examples, Trinidad hit nothing, cause Vargas doesnt have any balls from the steroids he took. They however dnt cry about the many fghts their fighters stole.Originally posted by DiegoFuegoyou Mexicans have more excuses than Golden Boy PromotionsLast edited by IwatchBoxing; 08-06-2005, 04:47 PM.Comment
Comment