Comments Thread For: Mayweather-Pacquiao; Drug Testing No Longer an Issue

[Blubba]

Whether you want to admit it or not, commissions do not create catchweights. They simply nod their head, as they did with OST. Or did OST NOT happen right under the au****es of the NSAC? And all they could muster was to ask to review the results. Grow up, kiddo. Catchweights aren't a rule.

whether u like it or not , contract or no contracts.

the commission do not oversee the ost test, usada does it.

catchweights and all weight division r over seen and created by the commission.

[ThePrince]

Mosley > Margarito & Clottey

I love this game.

Cotto>Mosley.

[IMDAZED]

I love this game.

Cotto>Mosley.

What year? it's 2010, bud.

[IMDAZED]

whether u like it or not , contract or no contracts.

the commission do not oversee the ost test, usada does it.

catchweights and all weight division r over seen and created by the commission.

No, catchweights are not created by the commission. Please name one catchweight they created. What division is that?

[brick wall]

okay finally someone who isn't just hurling 1 line stinkers my way..

anyway..

what did Schaefer actually say though? what was his actual quote? he didn't actually say anything that would require disproving but he also didn't come out and say "Manny accepted full testing in the negotiations" the way the article is trying to make it seem..

it's written carefully to create the image that Manny said he would take the test and Floyd's side didn't have anything to say when IN TRUTH Golden Boy was signed on as further promotional help, they had power and all but Floyd in the end was the one with the say so it really doesn't matter what Schaefer says now because Golden Boy and Mayweather's tie ended once negotiations for a fight ended, and even more so Schaefer didn't even say anything that "co-signed" Manny's comments all he did was not get into it he simply said "If Pacquiao said that then I'm sure he wouldn't lie about it" which isn't actually co-signing the way this idiot is trying to get you to believe

to co-sign something is to vouch for him, it's not an expression of you giving your opinion on a matter but actually putting up your credibility on the line. all Richard said was he doesn't think Manny would lie he didn't actually come out and say "he's not lying" he said that he's sure that if Manny said that to him that he isn't lying which isn't the same thing that Michael Moron is trying to insinuate. be fair and actually understand my perspective, clear your preferences and actually read this post with an open and equal mind

a lie and a stretching of the truth is not the same thing, at least in a court of law, so your whole "he knows what are the possible consequences of his articles to himself and to other people involved" is rendered useless, consequences occur when you tell lies, I said he COULD BE lying I didn't say he was actually lying. he was probably told these things but the perception of the article that HE created was that Manny agreed and when he questioned Schaefer that Schaefer co-signed it and you can read in bold English that that is simply just not true

Schafer didn't actually co-sign anything he simply said he doesn't think Manny Pacquiao is a liar but he didn't co-sign what Manny actually said and that's the biggest disclaimer with me here, how can you say Drug Testing is no longer an issue and that both sides have said so when the Mayweather's work for themselves and they have yet to say anything? also how can you say that when what Richard Schaefer told you didn't actually co-sign anything? where does he find the solid ground to say that BOTH sides have said testing is not an issue when that is not what Schaefer nor the Mayweathers even said?

where exactly in my post did i say schaeffer co-signed whatever pac had said? you keep on repeating yourself like a parrot...i simply said marley quoted schaeffer. now is that quote of any relevance? in a way yes because we all know how schaeffer has been negative when it comes to pac in the past. now he's saying something like pac can't lie. whereas before he even denied that there was a 2nd negotiation notwithstanding that hbo confirmed it. could it be that he really knows something that transpired in that negotiation hmm? maybe he just denied the negotiation before because he was trying to defend floyd's decision to go on vacation. but after floyd's trysts with don king that may jeopardize their relationship with floyd, schaeffer is now beginning to change his tune. now he only says good things about pac. sounds fishy i should say.

also i didn't say in my post that drug testing is no longer an issue. but certainly, news like that should be taken with positive reactions for people who wants to see the fight. and while everyone else are taking 2 steps forward, you and the other *****s are taking a backward stance. that's why i wonder if you guys really wanna see the fight. i think you don't.

you know what's funny? if marley is a biased writer in favor of top rank and pac, which i think he is, then he's surely doing a disservice (if in case he's lying) because he's putting pac on spot...a spot where he can't have an option in the future. i'm sure you and the other *****s are gonna pull out this marley article in the future if pac says no to ost. you're going to be very thankful for this marley article because you can use it as a tool to condemn pac. but that will only happen of course if marley's quote of pac is a lie. if it's true indeed that drug testing will no longer be an issue then we should all be happy because the fight is finally happening, don't you think?

[Blubba]

No, catchweights are not created by the commission. Please name one catchweight they created. What division is that?

every catchweight is created by them.

they govern all of their own divisions and anything that falls inbetween is considered a catchweight.

[IMDAZED]

every catchweight is created by them.

they govern all divisions and anything that falls inbetween is considered a catchweight.

Name ONE catchweight a commission created.

[Blubba]

Name ONE catchweight a commission created.

just told u all of them

shall i pull out a history book and give u all in history of boxing catchweights lol!

[ThePrince]

What year? it's 2010, bud.

Uh, Cotto beat Mosley 3 years ago. In 2010, you really think a 39 year old Mosley can beat a 29 year old Cotto, especially considering their last respective fights?

Come on Son.

I don't even know why your account is still active. Your whole schtick was 'Manny is on PEDs, He will NEVER agree to testing'. Manny agreed, you're out of work.

[IMDAZED]

Uh, Cotto beat Mosley 3 years ago. In 2010, you really think a 39 year old Mosley can beat a 29 year old Cotto, especially considering their last respective fights?

Oh ok. I get it. Torrecampo > Pacquiao

I don't even know why your account is still active. Your whole schtick was 'Manny is on PEDs, He will NEVER agree to testing'. Manny agreed, you're out of work.

I've never had a conversation with you yet you know my "schtick?" How big am I? Go ahead, I know you know. ****ing clown.