M.Marley: "Pac told me he AGREED to random testing demands, no cutoff, no if's & buts

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Xeraser
    Interim Champion
    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
    • Nov 2009
    • 880
    • 17
    • 0
    • 7,567

    #11
    It's a foregone conclusion that Floyd will never fight Pacquaio. He has all the reasons in the world to fight Pacquiao but he chose the flight mode. OST is just his bluff, as soon as pacquaio called his bluff then all of a sudden he does not have the urge to fight and he's taking a vacation. Floyd is just teasing everybody.

    Comment

    • Story
      Am I free to go ?
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Sep 2009
      • 5304
      • 103
      • 168
      • 11,684

      #12
      Originally posted by MONEY 32
      When he fought Cotto he done good PPV numbers similar if not more then what Floyd did with Marquez, so Floyd agreed to 50/50.

      Then he done bad numbers with Clottey and Floyd did MUCH better numbers with Mosley so Floyd is intitled to bigger split....
      :*******: :*******:

      Comment

      • IMDAZED
        Fair but Firm
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • May 2006
        • 42644
        • 1,134
        • 1,770
        • 67,152

        #13
        Sure you did, Manolo.

        Comment

        • ThePrince
          Undisputed Champion
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Feb 2010
          • 5877
          • 364
          • 49
          • 12,832

          #14
          Old News. But glad someone other than Pacquiao, Roach, and Mayweather acknowledged this. So GBP has officially, on record, admitted that Pacquiao agreed to full random OSDT.

          So, I guess the money split is the new go-to excuse, huh?

          *****s, pack your bags!

          Comment

          • jrosales13
            undisputed champion
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Sep 2008
            • 32632
            • 738
            • 763
            • 40,023

            #15
            Originally posted by MONEY 32
            Yeah but he looked for 50/50.

            He is not intitled to that
            Originally posted by Sweet Jesus
            60/40 i kick your ass
            Originally posted by MONEY 32
            When he fought Cotto he done good PPV numbers similar if not more then what Floyd did with Marquez, so Floyd agreed to 50/50.

            Then he done bad numbers with Clottey and Floyd did MUCH better numbers with Mosley so Floyd is intitled to bigger split....
            I don't know what Pac agreed or not agree to.

            From what I read it was a 14 day cutoff and that is it. I know Pac has said no cutoff date. But, I haven't gotten any other source.

            If Floyd didn't fight cuz he didn't get OST with no cutoff date. Then that is understandable.

            However, if Floyd didn't want to fight cuz he wanted more than 50/50 than by all means Floyd duck Pac. 50/50 is fair.

            Comment

            • MONEY 32
              Banned
              Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
              • Sep 2010
              • 491
              • 29
              • 5
              • 623

              #16
              Originally posted by Story
              :*******: :*******:
              Butthurt cause you got owned, lol

              Comment

              • B.U.R.N.E.R
                ~NSB Legend 2005-2015~
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Feb 2010
                • 30186
                • 1,344
                • 400
                • 47,475

                #17
                Not buying it...........

                Where was all this when the talks were live? Arum. Pac, Roach no one would comment on what Arums terms were.

                Now that the fight is surely off we get a new article every week.

                Im callin bs.

                Comment

                • Hasha
                  Contender
                  • Aug 2010
                  • 370
                  • 6
                  • 20
                  • 6,565

                  #18
                  Originally posted by No Ceilings
                  Not buying it...........

                  Where was all this when the talks were live? Arum. Pac, Roach no one would comment on what Arums terms were.

                  Now that the fight is surely off we get a new article every week.

                  Im callin bs.
                  Good point...and it still doesn't justify why he didn't agree from before...if it weakened him then, it should still weaken him now?

                  Comment

                  • ThePrince
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Feb 2010
                    • 5877
                    • 364
                    • 49
                    • 12,832

                    #19
                    Originally posted by No Ceilings
                    Not buying it...........

                    Where was all this when the talks were live? Arum. Pac, Roach no one would comment on what Arums terms were.

                    Now that the fight is surely off we get a new article every week.

                    Im callin bs.
                    If you're not buying it, or calling bs, that means you're calling Pacquiao, Roach, Mayweather, and Golden Boy Promotions liars.

                    That pretty much covers all parties concerned

                    You need to come to terms with the fact that Floyd outright ducked Manny, went on vacation and retired again once his bluff was called. Move on, time heals all wounds.

                    Comment

                    • jrosales13
                      undisputed champion
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Sep 2008
                      • 32632
                      • 738
                      • 763
                      • 40,023

                      #20
                      Originally posted by Hasha
                      Good point...and it still doesn't justify why he didn't agree from before...if it weakened him then, it should still weaken him now?
                      So he should NEVER agree to it?

                      Well OK then.....

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP