I just watched Barrera vs Pacquaio for the first time. I noticed that in the Barrera fight Pacquaio seemed like 3x sharper than he was against Morales. If Pacquaio fought the same way he did against Barrera against Morales he would have won because he beat the living f**K out of Barrera.
Maybe all those Phillipino bigshots being at that fight and everything kind of iced him. Or Pacquaio has lost some hunger since beating Barrera.
PAC started off shape against Morales, but once he saw that he couldn't hurt him, and felt that jab in his face, he slowed down, Morales took that fight, and PAc would not be able to beat him on any night. It just like Holy and Tyson. Holy and Morales are the better men
PAC started off shape against Morales, but once he saw that he couldn't hurt him, and felt that jab in his face, he slowed down, Morales took that fight, and PAc would not be able to beat him on any night. It just like Holy and Tyson. Holy and Morales are the better men
I disagree, he never looked as sharp vs Morales as he did the whole 11 rounds vs Barrera. Fredie Roach needs to rehipnotize him.
If Pacquaio fought the way he did against Barrera against Morales like I said in an earlier post Pacquaio would win handily by descision. He didn't seem one dimensional at all vs Barrera and was just super sharp, throwing a variety of punches and relentless.
Comment