Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Antonio Margarito: Pacquiao Fight is Going To Be a War!

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by artphotog View Post
    I agree. I think the most important physical attribute in boxing is speed. It negates power, and a chin. Pac has power = to if not more than Margs.

    If Pac fought Margs like he fought Clottey I could see it being a nice fight. But why the hell would Pac do that when he can dismantle him physically and take away his will to fight mentally by fighting like he did against Diaz, or De La Hoya. Clottey got those uppercuts in only because Pac squared up to him to get through Pac's defense. If Margs fought like this and forced Manny to square up and lands something good it could be interesting.

    Margs is a face first warrior, this wont happen. Pac will control the fight with his foot movement. Margs will never land anything clean. Watch Diaz or De La Hoya.
    pac too is a face first warrior, and he will square up always does this is how jmm outconnected him twice in their fights. pac need to get into the tremendous reach advantage of margs and he aint gonna do that without taking shots,pac wont win this fight running away he at one point will have to brawl, and jump into the fire.this isnt delaquitter or clottey the passive guy or cotto the washed up retreater, margs will throw more than manny as he has the world record for punch output a record that still stands , and hes not going to fade down the stretch. mannys speed is his only advantage . im not conviced that will be enough.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by boxingfan76 View Post
      Margs destroyed cotto. pac ducked mosley.
      yah, you seem to like margarito with his cement gloves all da time...and i didnt know its called ducking when a fighter (pac) decides to fight a fighter (cotto) for his belt then against a fighter (mosley) that cotto already had beaten...dont make sense to me.

      for your information, cottos face was more messed up at the end of the fight with pac than it did with cement gloves margarito...it took cement glove margarito what 10, 11 rounds? pac didnt need any cement in his gloves to finish cotto in the 12th...what margarito did to cotto with cement, pac did the same, but without the cement ;o)
      Last edited by indystress; 09-29-2010, 03:12 PM.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by indystress View Post
        oh ok, lets forget what pac did in the past, but u want to bring up margaritos past...what da huck? oh ok, shoots...pacs welterweight fights (cotto and clottey) both were TOP 5 welterweights...thats two TOP 5 welterweights in his first two welterweight fight...cant count the fight against delahoya, that was a fantasy fight, a circus show, hahaha
        who da huck goes up in weight and fights his first two fights against the TOP 5 fighters of that division? needless to say, against a belt holder that already had beaten another belt holder (mosley) oh i know...PACQUIAO ;o)

        how long did margarito take before he fought two of the TOP 5 welterweight...um yah, hello!!!
        when has pac ever fought a top welter?? never.your beating a dead horse pal margs has fought better if pac wins or if he loses margs still has faced and beaten better opponents, than pac has .and has beaten better fighters with better fundamentals than pac IS.no amount of hype will ever change that. if pac had beaten the all the guys margs has hed be freakin sugar ray robinson!!!!!!! hes only beat hatton impressivley latley pfpfffff
        Last edited by boxingfan76; 09-29-2010, 03:19 PM.

        Comment


        • wow this fight is gona sell really good people r really pumped up for this??hmmmmmm

          Comment


          • Originally posted by boxingfan76 View Post
            when has pac ever fought a top welter?? never.your beating a dead horse pal margs has fought better if pac wins or if he loses margs has faced and beaten better opponents, than pac has .and has beaten better fighters with better fundamentals than pac IS.no amount of hype will ever change that.
            you must be a *****SEXUAL to be blind to the fact that pac fought two TOP 5 WELTERWEIGHTS in his first two welterweight fights...i guess the rankings was just an illusion...the dead horse is the horse you're beating my *****SEXUAL friend. like i said, your comments are equal to FELONY FRAUDS actions = all b/s

            if sugar ray leonard says pac is da p4p, i believe him...if bernard hopkins ays pac is the p4p, i believe him...if mike tyson says pac is p4p, i believe him, if lennix lewis says pac is p4p, i beleive him...if the vast majority says pac is fighter of the year several times over, i believe them...if the vast majority of the media says pac is fighter of the decade, i believe them...but if you tell me he's not, how can i beleive you? hello? mcfly?
            Last edited by indystress; 09-29-2010, 03:19 PM.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by indystress View Post
              yah, you seem to like margarito with his cement gloves all da time...and i didnt know its called ducking when a fighter (pac) decides to fight a fighter (cotto) for his belt then against a fighter (mosley) that cotto already had beaten...dont make sense to me.

              for your information, cottos face was more messed up at the end of the fight with pac than it did with cement gloves margarito...it took cement glove margarito what 10, 11 rounds? pac didnt need any cement in his gloves to finish cotto in the 12th
              it was(cottos face) i tell cotto stans this all the time and if u had a brain youd realize maybe he didnt have bricks because there isnt a shred of evidence other than cotto is a quitter when he faces adversity.your hopes are based on conclusions that will never be proven one way or the other mine are on facts. if cottos face got more busted up to guy thats smaller and we know had no bricks , how is that evidence margrito had them ?? thats sooo ****** dude who even thinks like that.???????

              Comment


              • Originally posted by indystress View Post
                you must be a *****SEXUAL to be blind to the fact that pac fought two TOP 5 WELTERWEIGHTS in his first two welterweight fights...i guess the rankings was just an illusion...the dead horse is the horse you're beating my *****SEXUAL friend. like i said, your comments are equal to FELONY FRAUDS actions = all b/s
                blah blah blah, all i hear from u is u love floyd jr, your obsessed with the guy.

                Comment


                • Margacheato is going to get KO'd in a one-sided fight. Afterwards he'll claim he over-trained or was weight-drained for an excuse.

                  Comment


                  • Wow...this thread still going? The Tijuana Tomato Can is gonna lose. Nobody will bet 1:1 on him. Lol.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by boxingfan76 View Post
                      it was(cottos face) i tell cotto stans this all the time and if u had a brain youd realize maybe he didnt have bricks because there isnt a shred of evidence other than cotto is a quitter when he faces adversity.your hopes are based on conclusions that will never be proven one way or the other mine are on facts. if cottos face got more busted up to guy thats smaller and we know had no bricks , how is that evidence margrito had them ?? thats sooo ****** dude who even thinks like that.???????
                      thats what im trying to tell you...that pac is much stronger than you think...thats all im trying to say bro man ;o)

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP