If Mayweather fought and beat Pac, would you still consider him a ducker historically

[joelab75]

still wouldnt change the FACT that he ducked Margarito, Cotto and Shane back in 2007 when he choose to retire. only to comeback and fight a lightweight JMM in his tune up. i dont give a damn if the fight was a tune up. fight a guy in ur division, ur own size.

[joelab75]

one more thing. even if they fight Mayweather wouldnt beat Manny.

[jrosales13]

The worst thing to see at times on this forum is seeing good posters red k'd with 0 rep power (*******s Red k'ing Floyd's fans), and you see a ****ty poster(*******s) with a rep power of 90, and his opinion on boxing is ****tier than a 1568 privy lol...

Is that a shot at LHT?

Son, you don't have half of the boxing knowledge that the Tua man has.

[Frank Ducketts]

Is that a shot at LHT?

Son, you don't have half of the boxing knowledge that the Tua man has.

J-Googs is in the house lol... Son, I've ****ted on the both of you when it comes to boxing. You google all of your boxing knowledge, and he lies, and gives ****ty opinions about Floyd. I'll **** on either of you any day of the week.

[Frank Ducketts]

still wouldnt change the FACT that he ducked Margarito, Cotto and Shane back in 2007 when he choose to retire. only to comeback and fight a lightweight JMM in his tune up. i dont give a damn if the fight was a tune up. fight a guy in ur division, ur own size.

Real boxing fans know the real deal. *******s and phony mofo's don't do the research...

[Dynamite Kid]

still wouldnt change the FACT that he ducked Margarito, Cotto and Shane back in 2007 when he choose to retire. only to comeback and fight a lightweight JMM in his tune up. i dont give a damn if the fight was a tune up. fight a guy in ur division, ur own size.

Agree man, a one of fight against a guy, who is a smaller guy lets not forget, is not going to be enough for me.

[M.I Truth ?]

he's ducked pacquiao twice already.

just because he beats pacquiao doesn't mean he didn't duck him the 1st two times.

First time was Pacs fault. He walked away when Floyd still was trying to make a deal. Second time was Floyd's fault. He wouldn't come to the table. I think pac wasn't too interested in that fight in March and Floyd wasn't interested in Novemeber. If only they could be interested at the same time.

[jrosales13]

J-Googs is in the house lol... Son, I've ****ted on the both of you when it comes to boxing. You google all of your boxing knowledge, and he lies, and gives ****ty opinions about Floyd. I'll **** on either of you any day of the week.

Right mr WBC is an official belt you keep telling yourself that to make you feel better

[Ryn0]

Yeah, I would personally. Above 135 especially his body of work at 135 and 130 was amazing but compared to who he could've fought at 140-147 as oppose to who he did beat theres a huge gap.

Who honestly gave people like Gatti, Baldomir and Judah a chance (especially after Judahs fight with Baldo) There was fights with Margarito (who I think pre-Mosley would be the biggest threat to Floyd, he's easy to hit but his style compares favourably to fighters who use Floyds defence, like Rios and Peterson, obviously Peterson isn't Floyd but Rios isn't Tony)

[King Ju-Ju]

I would 2 for the same reason. He retired at a time when the 147 pound division was poppin' and didn't fight any of them. After Cotto beat Mosley and he ko'd Hatton, they should have fought. People say he would have beaten Cotto, that's fine. I just would like 2 see him beat him. Isn't that what its all about??? His defenders make it seem like he was 2 good 2 even fight Cotto, Margarito, Williams. **** even after Quintana upset Paul, he coud have gotten in their with him. See a lil technical boxing fight. Any1 at that time would have been good. A young a Berto, take him 2 school. Cintron was the IBF champ at that time. He could have fought him and see what stunt Kermit would have pulled in there. Floyd just retired instead and called himself the G.O.A.T.