Cotto's decision...wait for winner Pac vs Marg!!

**Swag Hustla** · 09-22-2010, 07:20 AM

Originally posted by whitealltrac

I just read this today as it was anounced on the PRBoxea.com page.

Cotto will wait for the winner Pacman vs Cheater and he will fight the winner!

Source:

http://platzpr.com/prboxea/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1121

What do you guys think??

Cotto always wanted a rematch with Pac, but he's always stated that he would never fight Margarito again because he doesn't want to give him the payday.

Doesn't make sense unless he's putting all his chips in for a Pac victory.

**Pin Galarga** · 09-22-2010, 07:20 AM

Smart business man. He also can use more time to heal from his shoulder injury. I hope He gets a rematch against Pacquiao at 154. Cotto can bring a much compatable fight now with Emmanuel, not been drained to the bone and with some more time to recover from the plaster and superman assaults.
I see Cotto braking more than the right ear drum.

**playaballer1** · 09-22-2010, 07:25 AM

Originally posted by Pin Galarga

Smart business man. He also can use more time to heal from his shoulder injury. I hope He gets a rematch against Pacquiao at 154. Cotto can bring a much compatable fight now with Emmanuel, not been drained to the bone and with some more time to recover from the plaster and superman assaults.
I see Cotto braking more than the right ear drum.

Yea I agree Cotto being drained to the bone by 1 pound was the reason he loss against pac

**shade darkar** · 09-22-2010, 07:31 AM

cotto margarito 2 would be ok, but pac vs cotto 2 would be pointless.

**Pin Galarga** · 09-22-2010, 07:38 AM

Originally posted by playaballer1

Yea I agree Cotto being drained to the bone by 1 pound was the reason he loss against pac

Exactly. Cotto was the Champion and He was drained by the challenger and his own promoter.
They had no problems facing Clottey at 147, but they knew they were taking away from Cotto when they made come down or no fight.

Roach has been quoted and it's common knowledge that HE likes to take away from guys that have an actual chance to upset. So Hell YES, that's the main reason why He lost to Pacquiao beside all the other factors of being out of his game with no corner.

**CUNTLEE** · 09-22-2010, 07:43 AM

Originally posted by Pin Galarga

Exactly. Cotto was the Champion and He was drained by the challenger and his own promoter.
They had no problems facing Clottey at 147, but they knew they were taking away from Cotto when they made come down or no fight.

Roach has been quoted and it's common knowledge that HE likes to take away from guys that have an actual chance to upset. So Hell YES, that's the main reason why He lost to Pacquiao beside all the other factors of being out of his game with no corner.

cotto lost cause mannys better

**Pin Galarga** · 09-22-2010, 07:50 AM

I wouldn't expect any less from his worshipers but this is what happens when you make a champion come down on weight to defend his title.
YOU DON'T GET FULL CREDIT! Simple.

**CUNTLEE** · 09-22-2010, 07:56 AM

Originally posted by Pin Galarga

I wouldn't expect any less from his worshipers but this is what happens when you make a champion come down on weight to defend his title.
YOU DON'T GET FULL CREDIT! Simple.

he got full credit and cottos belt.lol

**SirTomJones** · 09-22-2010, 08:03 AM

Cotto ain't half the man he was.

MAnny by KO/TKO again

Cotto's decision...wait for winner Pac vs Marg!!