Tweet
When in doubt and youre in the middle of a losing debate, simply put them on ignore, then you win by default since that other guy cant post in your thread anymore!
great strategy.
Ill finish it just because I cant help it.
-Barrett was never better than a journeyman, who is no better than Goofy Whitaker and went on to get KOed by Valuev, Cliff Couser, David Haye and Solis.
-Bostice was a mediocre fighter who was dropped twice by a fellow mediocre 14-8 Israel Cole less than a year before he fought Wladimir and cemeted his position as a clubfighter by being a stepping stone for other fighters that wanted to pad their records to get an undeserved title shot.
-You could at least have done some research before making such a ****** claim about Shufford. What made him impressive? his dominant loss to Robert Davis, while not winning a single round?
And oh Tunney/Freedom Fighter, only you would try to up an fighter for 'never having been knocked down' when in reality in the Robert Davis fight Shufford was knocked down in the 2nd round.
Thats why no one takes you seriously when you make such outrageous claims, such as Charles Shufford, Bostice and Barrett being impressive wins.
great strategy.
Ill finish it just because I cant help it.
You think Tony Thompson was a good win, don't you? You'll never find me claim that.
Barrett has only one close decision loss when he fought Wlad. He had never been knocked down. Wlad knocked him down five time, he was in bad shape and bleeding badly at the end of it.
Bostice was a confident young 21-1 fighter who had never been stopped. Wlad knocked him down twice in the first and twice in the second. Bostice wept openly on his stool after it was over. He was mentally damaged, never a confident fighter after that beating, and then lost to opponents he would have previously beaten.
Shufford was well-regarded before he fought Wlad, having only decision one loss. He had never been knocked down in a fight. After being knocked down in an early round, and later KOed by a beautiful left hook (one of my favorite Wlad KOs) Shufford was never a confident fighter and lost more fights.
Barrett has only one close decision loss when he fought Wlad. He had never been knocked down. Wlad knocked him down five time, he was in bad shape and bleeding badly at the end of it.
Bostice was a confident young 21-1 fighter who had never been stopped. Wlad knocked him down twice in the first and twice in the second. Bostice wept openly on his stool after it was over. He was mentally damaged, never a confident fighter after that beating, and then lost to opponents he would have previously beaten.
Shufford was well-regarded before he fought Wlad, having only decision one loss. He had never been knocked down in a fight. After being knocked down in an early round, and later KOed by a beautiful left hook (one of my favorite Wlad KOs) Shufford was never a confident fighter and lost more fights.
-Bostice was a mediocre fighter who was dropped twice by a fellow mediocre 14-8 Israel Cole less than a year before he fought Wladimir and cemeted his position as a clubfighter by being a stepping stone for other fighters that wanted to pad their records to get an undeserved title shot.
-You could at least have done some research before making such a ****** claim about Shufford. What made him impressive? his dominant loss to Robert Davis, while not winning a single round?
And oh Tunney/Freedom Fighter, only you would try to up an fighter for 'never having been knocked down' when in reality in the Robert Davis fight Shufford was knocked down in the 2nd round.
Thats why no one takes you seriously when you make such outrageous claims, such as Charles Shufford, Bostice and Barrett being impressive wins.
Comment