funny how some people think that...with pac deciding to fight a cotto that had a welterweight belt...and also a cotto that had recently beat mosley...considered ducking mosley? i dont get that? especially after margarito got busted and got embarrassed...i would think the embarrassment was one reason why margarito lost to mosley
besides, roach doesnt decide who pac fights...its arum...and arum choose to have pac for a belt that cotto had...the cotto that had already beaten mosley...with this being said, do you still think it was better to fight cotto for cottos belt, and a cotto win over mosley....OR smarter to fight mosley who have lost to cotto and had no belt at that time? YOU'RE SO SMART???
besides, roach doesnt decide who pac fights...its arum...and arum choose to have pac for a belt that cotto had...the cotto that had already beaten mosley...with this being said, do you still think it was better to fight cotto for cottos belt, and a cotto win over mosley....OR smarter to fight mosley who have lost to cotto and had no belt at that time? YOU'RE SO SMART???

Comment