Alexander-Bradley Will Have Rematch Clause

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ATG Fighter
    One and Only
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Dec 2009
    • 4049
    • 49
    • 63
    • 10,578

    #1

    Alexander-Bradley Will Have Rematch Clause

    danrafaelespn

    Khan-Maidana set, Alexander-Bradley close. Ideally, winners fight, but I'm told there will be a rematch clause on both sides in Alex-Brad.
  • mrpain81
    Undisputed Champion
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Jun 2007
    • 12115
    • 986
    • 870
    • 35,268

    #2
    I'm happy with best 2 out of 3 for Khan vs. Maidana and Alexander vs. Bradley.

    Comment

    • Earl-Hickey
      Banned
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Nov 2009
      • 29031
      • 2,832
      • 1,384
      • 297,750

      #3
      thats ridiculous, so what happens is Winner of Khan-Maidana probably has to fight Ortiz, then the winner of that fights the winner of Bradley-Alexander 2 in like 2013.

      so much for clarifying the division

      Comment

      • Rome-By-Ko
        The winner Is
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Mar 2009
        • 20157
        • 323
        • 332
        • 29,833

        #4
        I'm kool with seeing them scrap twice..But I hope the winner will be able to fight the winner of Khan Maidana first...

        Comment

        • DET. IRONSIDE
          Banned
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Jun 2010
          • 3736
          • 169
          • 246
          • 4,285

          #5
          Originally posted by Earl-Hickey
          thats ridiculous, so what happens is Winner of Khan-Maidana probably has to fight Ortiz, then the winner of that fights the winner of Bradley-Alexander 2 in like 2013.

          so much for clarifying the division
          Meanwhile theres a fight with Judah on the cards. Yoshihiro Kamegai would be worth a trip to Japan. Kaizer Mabuza or Olusegun for some African coverage?

          And if theres a rematch clause, does that necessarily mean the winner can't fight for the WBA belt?

          Comment

          • Earl-Hickey
            Banned
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Nov 2009
            • 29031
            • 2,832
            • 1,384
            • 297,750

            #6
            Originally posted by DET. IRONSIDE
            Meanwhile theres a fight with Judah on the cards. Yoshihiro Kamegai would be worth a trip to Japan. Kaizer Mabuza or Olusegun for some African coverage?

            And if theres a rematch clause, does that necessarily mean the winner can't fight for the WBA belt?
            I dont know, political bull****.

            I dont mind a rematch if its between two of the biigest stars in the sport, Mayweather-Pac, rematch clause is fine, but this is just Bradley vs Alexander, seriously this **** wont be on ppv, it wont draw more than 15,000, theres no need for rematch clauses in a fight like this.

            Comment

            • DET. IRONSIDE
              Banned
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Jun 2010
              • 3736
              • 169
              • 246
              • 4,285

              #7
              Don't worry. Theres always this guy.



              That would be a fight that would have RATINGS all over it, no matter who fights him in that division.

              Comment

              • Heru
                Quintessence
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Apr 2008
                • 9492
                • 533
                • 353
                • 26,205

                #8
                Originally posted by Earl-Hickey
                thats ridiculous, so what happens is Winner of Khan-Maidana probably has to fight Ortiz, then the winner of that fights the winner of Bradley-Alexander 2 in like 2013.

                so much for clarifying the division
                You're complaining about the winner of Khan-Maidana fighting Ortiz, while 2 of the best Jr. Welterweights in Bradley and Alexander possibly rematch what will surely be a great first fight?

                Not only that, but they'll probably unify before the end of next year. Boxing fans cannot be pleased.

                Comment

                • mrpain81
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Jun 2007
                  • 12115
                  • 986
                  • 870
                  • 35,268

                  #9
                  Originally posted by QUELOQUE
                  You're complaining about the winner of Khan-Maidana fighting Ortiz, while 2 of the best Jr. Welterweights in Bradley and Alexander possibly rematch what will surely be a great first fight?

                  Not only that, but they'll probably unify before the end of next year. Boxing fans cannot be pleased.
                  No doubt about it that boxing fans bitch for the sake of bitching.

                  It's like complaining that u have to pay taxes on the lottery money you won.

                  Comment

                  • onechance87
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • Aug 2009
                    • 12753
                    • 244
                    • 0
                    • 20,080

                    #10
                    Originally posted by QUELOQUE
                    You're complaining about the winner of Khan-Maidana fighting Ortiz, while 2 of the best Jr. Welterweights in Bradley and Alexander possibly rematch what will surely be a great first fight?

                    Not only that, but they'll probably unify before the end of next year. Boxing fans cannot be pleased.
                    ortiz is a tough fight for anyone.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP