Champs that have stayed closer to their natural weight or the same weight throughout their career?
Do YOU rate multidivision champs higher than........
Collapse
-
-
depends. if you just go after someone who just happened to win the belt quickly and is not really the champ there, just a guy that happens to have an alphabet belt...thats not really THAT big a deal.
If you go up in weight to beat a guy whos been established there and is highly regarded at the weight, thats another thing.
let me put it this way:
A win over a very good guy at your weight is still better than a good guy at a higher weight
But a win over a very good guy at a higher weight is probably going to be considered better than a very good guy at your own weight.
It depends on the quality of the fighters you beat.Comment
-
Typically, although I hold Arthur Abraham/Klitschkos in higher regard than Zsolt Erdei, a 2-division champ.Comment
-
Yeah I agree. Me and a friend of mine were arguing on pac's (as he said) "greatness" I don't take any credit away from him and his accomplishments, he's a great fighter. But he was getting mad at how I think that's not all it's cracked out to be, as he hasn't unified the higher weights.
And yes I think unifying, cleaning out the one or two divisions is a great feat all it's own.
Kind of like trying to compare Oscar and Felix, which I think are a pretty good comparisonComment
-
Comment
Comment