Originally posted by oakleyno1
Worst desistions ever
Collapse
-
i agree on all 3 of these fight, but they where very close fights. on efight that i didn't think was close at all was Bryd vs. Fres oquendo. that was a bad decision, i'm glad it happened though, cause i would hate to see Fres as a champion -
De la hoya gave that fight away, everyone knows that, and knows that he couldve won that fight without a doubt but he didnt. Hes ****** for letting him winOriginally posted by ParodiusNope that was a very close fight. De La Hoya was running like a bunny like is buddy Bitchkins in the last 4 rounds. He didn't do **** in that fight to deserve a win.Comment
-
I really apreciate this post,it is a really good arguement.Originally posted by shemmuewhitaker was a masterful boxer and prob. had arguably the best defense in the history of the sport he made guys look silly in there ..the judges are not there for entertaiment purposes they are there to score a fight so i don't buy the excuse that because of his style he should not be given rnds. that he clearly won especialy the chavez fight which i also considered the worst dec. ever.
But my piont is that, if I had a hard time keeping my eyes on the man, I,m sure others did as well, right or not.
I also always got the impression tha all he wanted to do in there, was to make a man miss without really wanting to make him pay. There are many Fighters today that have the talent to do that, but but I believe will not, because they learned there lesson from Whitaker. ( no money ).
DelaHoya tried the same thing with Trinadad and was slammed. ( even though he did not look as natural at doing it. )
I also believe that Whitaker got credit for illegal tactics, that he should'nt of. Although I thought he won the Chavez fight, I dont consider it the worst decision even in the last 10 years, much less of all time.Comment
-
leonard/hagler...a gift to the general public
reid/ottke...never wanted to see another ottke fight after
this one. did i miss much?
augustus/burton.. in a smaller fight emanual blew the judges
minds with his antics and was robbed.Comment
-
Whitaker was a master boxer, last thing he was, was boring. Winky & Bitchkins are boring, especially Winky but noway Whitaker was boring. Whitaker never made fights boring. He took a good punch just like PBF. PBF is very similar to Whitaker, just with a bigger punch. Whitaker didn't have too much power, but boy the guy was a special boxer. Guys like PBF & Whitaker don't come everyday. These 2 guys are the best boxers I ever seen. You can't get better then these 2 guys.Originally posted by markmevald1Whitaker had a terrible, boring, unexiting style that I believe turned off almost anyone who watched him. Including judges. He might of won those fights, but who cares.Comment
-
Hagler was my idol when I was a kid. The guys is my favorite boxer of all time, I knew he won the fight against Sugar Ray but I can't put it in the worst decision ever, it was a close fight.Originally posted by steelheadleonard/hagler...a gift to the general public
reid/ottke...never wanted to see another ottke fight after
this one. did i miss much?
augustus/burton.. in a smaller fight emanual blew the judges
minds with his antics and was robbed.Comment
-
Oquendo vs Bryd was ****, just plain horrible, but whats funny is that if he had gotten the belt, Ruiz would own two today...Comment
-
ther are too many to list, Vincent V Barnes was a shocker
both the Vanzie v Earl fights,
Shultz formean
Lewis Holyield 1
De la hoya V sturm
Brodie Jorrin was a disgrace
woods getting a draw against johnson the first time as well.Comment
-
I almost forgot about tht one.Originally posted by SacTown1Manuel Medina's "loss" to Johnny Tapia, where Medina dominated 9-10 rounds of the match....Comment
Comment