Comments Thread For: Video: Floyd Mayweather Released After Being Arrested

[Kagami Taiga]

There are really no place to put your ******ity. Tell me which one Pac really should fight at 147? his current best weight. Pac already fought Cotto who beat Mosley, Floyd the best choice who beat Mosley went to vacation, he already fought, so the next logical choice is Margo. Dont tell me about no name fighters moving up, Pac moving down or Pac moving up at 154. Pac is testing the water fighting Margo at 150.

he doesnt have to fight at 147, but berto is more than better than margarito. or he could move back to 140, which roach says he can still make, and fight bradley. that bradley fight is easily the most intriguing fight i would want to see pac in. or pac an fight a real, u get it real, champ at 154. but that idea would be to farfetched right???

[Vasyl’s dad]

im showing u why ur examples make no sense. ur nitpicking for no reason. u make some dumb arguments so jsut because hatton and mayweather arent as great means that mayweather should have moved down?

i cant argue with fools. u want an explanation as to why it was good for boxing?? ppl were talking about it, it was everywhere, ppl wanted to see it, we had two undefeated fighhters fighting each other, it created intrigue and hattons fanclub bought something to the us that hadnt been there b4. not to mention the 24/7 series. it was a good fight no matter how hard u try to discredit it.

and no matter what i say i realize u'll try to use nonsensical arguments to refute, so im not gonna waste my time. if u think it was a bad fight cool, but most dont agree.

You're in no position to say anything about my examples as you barely understand them. I have to explain them to you more than once when the first time should have been more than enough for you to get. And you have the audacity to call me a fool? lol. Nowhere did I imply that "Mayweather isn't as great" as there was nothing to compare him to in that regard and nowhere did I suggest he should have went down because of that.




You're saying it was good for boxing because it was everywhere, people were talking about it yada yada yada.

So was DLH-Floyd, and guess what?

More people got turned off by that fight.

and you're saying that Manny vs Tony isn't.


What good for the sport came from Floyd v Hatton, and what bad is going to come to the sport because of Manny vs Tony?


Btw, I don't use nonsensical arguments, you're just too dense to understand their meaning.

[Tweezy316]

you sure were worried about these media outlets and info...now some is out bad vs ur boy and u dont care, it doesnt have anything to do with u.They should mind their own business?! HAHAH

hah you pulled up some of my old quotes and proved absolutely NOTHING!! Everything I commented on had to do with boxing and the negotiations. I don't give a damn about uncle roger fightin girls or floyd hittin his baby mama. Or Pac cheatin on his wife. I DON'T CARE!! Why should I? I'm a fan of Floyd's skills not a Fan of Floyd!! That's the difference between me and you fan boys.

[PrettyBoy22]

You're in no position to say anything about my examples as you barely understand them. I have to explain them to you more than once when the first time should have been more than enough for you to get. And you have the audacity to call me a fool? lol. Nowhere did I imply that "Mayweather isn't as great" as there was nothing to compare him to in that regard and nowhere did I suggest he should have went down because of that.




You're saying it was good for boxing because it was everywhere, people were talking about it yada yada yada.

So was DLH-Floyd, and guess what?

More people got turned off by that fight.

and you're saying that Manny vs Tony isn't.


What good for the sport came from Floyd v Hatton, and what bad is going to come to the sport because of Manny vs Tony?


Btw, I don't use nonsensical arguments, you're just too dense to understand their meaning.

That is how boxing works nowadays with the internet, programs like 24/7 etc etc. The hype is a massive part of the fight, whether you like to admit it or not Hatton v Mayweather was waaaaaaay more hyped than Pac v Margarito will ever be- and it's impossible to say whether Pac v Marg will be good or bad for boxing until after the fight, surely?

Also, fights been good or bad for boxing is about OPINION. It ain't a fact. You could say something was good for the sport, someone else could say it was bad. For the record- most believe Floyd v Hatton was good for the sport. It created alot of hype around the world and got people INTERESTED IN BOXING. You've gotta see that most mainstream fans don't care about whether it was at 140 or 147 and they were the ones getting exicted for it- that is why the fight was good for boxing.

[whirlwind]

he doesnt have to fight at 147, but berto is more than better than margarito. or he could move back to 140, which roach says he can still make, and fight bradley. that bradley fight is easily the most intriguing fight i would want to see pac in. or pac an fight a real, u get it real, champ at 154. but that idea would be to farfetched right???

lol! Did you know that Pac is no. 1 p4p and a cashcow for everyone? Fighting Berto or Bradley at 140/147 we already know the outcome beside no money in this fight. We all know Pac is a 140 fighter to the max because all his fight at 147 he did not weighed in more than above 144. So by asking him to fight someone at 154 is ok for you but we will not hear you asking other fighters to do the same like Floyd. Your not bias isn't it?

[Kagami Taiga]

lol! Did you know that Pac is no. 1 p4p and a cashcow for everyone? Fighting Berto or Bradley at 140/147 we already know the outcome beside no money in this fight. We all know Pac is a 140 fighter to the max because all his fight at 147 he did not weighed in more than above 144. So by asking him to fight someone at 154 is ok for you but we will not hear you asking other fighters to do the same like Floyd. Your not bias isn't it?

so you kno pac will beat berto and u kno pac will beat bradley, so why fight them??? i kno he'll beat maragrito, in fact im more certain of him beating margs than i am of him beating either of the other 2. and if floyd was continue fighting, i would expect the same from him, either manny, berto, bradley, pwill or a guy at 154. its that simple. i hold both to the same level when it comes to what they do in the ring. outside the ring, who gives a ****?

[El Jesus]

lol! Did you know that Pac is no. 1 p4p and a cashcow for everyone? Fighting Berto or Bradley at 140/147 we already know the outcome beside no money in this fight. We all know Pac is a 140 fighter to the max because all his fight at 147 he did not weighed in more than above 144. So by asking him to fight someone at 154 is ok for you but we will not hear you asking other fighters to do the same like Floyd. Your not bias isn't it?

pacquiao hasnt faced anyone with fast hands in ages. i cant remember the last fighter he fought with skill and handspeed. those two guys you mentioned have both.

instead we get another slow, flat footed plodding fighter whom he can look great and fast against, with little to no headmovement.

yea hell just blow right by berto and bradley, two guys who can actually punch with him.

get the **** outta here.

[pasawayako]

lol at Clottey bein a tune up. you non boxing watching hater.......

And if it was floyd who fought clottey it would be one of floyd's best win of his entire career. LOL.

[Spacey1991]

No proof on any beatings yet, shes made it up before and very well could be making it up again, not saying she is or isn't, just waiting for more info. He wasn't arrested for beating her or anything, just said to have gone through her things. If he did though thats just ****ing out of line.

Anyway, just to change the subject... any Pacquiao fans who try to twist this around so it has something to do with Manny are ****ing dillusional, seriously.

[Carpe Diem]

And if it was floyd who fought clottey it would be one of floyd's best win of his entire career. LOL.

Go to sleep, Wackyo.