In your prime

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • vellz13
    Contender
    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
    • Sep 2010
    • 102
    • 0
    • 0
    • 6,190

    #1

    In your prime

    What exactly does this mean? I know what some will say however i have never heard a losing boxer say he lost because he was past his prime
  • jri9d0
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • May 2009
    • 5107
    • 190
    • 0
    • 12,323

    #2
    It means when you have peaked in skill, youth and athaletic ability. It's rare you would hear a boxer make an excuse for being past his prime it's usually his fans that do it for him.

    Comment

    • bojangles1987
      bo jungle
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Jul 2009
      • 41118
      • 1,326
      • 357
      • 63,028

      #3
      Originally posted by jri9d0
      It means when you have peaked in skill, youth and athaletic ability. It's rare you would hear a boxer make an excuse for being past his prime it's usually his fans that do it for him.
      I don't even think youth factors in. It's whenever a fighter is at his best point of skill, smarts, and athleticism combined. You can be 37 and be prime if you retain enough athleticism to go along with much better ring smarts and skill than you had at 30.

      Comment

      • vellz13
        Contender
        Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
        • Sep 2010
        • 102
        • 0
        • 0
        • 6,190

        #4
        Originally posted by jri9d0
        it means when you have peaked in skill, youth and athaletic ability. It's rare you would hear a boxer make an excuse for being past his prime it's usually his fans that do it for him.
        i appreciate the reply to my first post. In my opinion and thats just what it is if every fighter fought each other in their prime who would lose? It makes me think alot

        Comment

        • jri9d0
          Undisputed Champion
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • May 2009
          • 5107
          • 190
          • 0
          • 12,323

          #5
          Originally posted by vellz13
          i appreciate the reply to my first post. In my opinion and thats just what it is if every fighter fought each other in their prime who would lose? It makes me think alot
          It depends, you have heard the old phrase "styles make fights" and so forth is a true statement.

          Believe it or not there are even fighters who have fought in there prime and didn't even put in a 100% training and still lose i.e Wilfred Benitez is a great example. Heart is a big factor as well.

          By the way, welcome to Boxingscene.com

          Comment

          • vellz13
            Contender
            Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
            • Sep 2010
            • 102
            • 0
            • 0
            • 6,190

            #6
            Originally posted by jri9d0
            it depends, you have heard the old phrase "styles make fights" and so forth is a true statement.

            Believe it or not there are even fighters who have fought in there prime and didn't even put in a 100% training and still lose i.e wilfred benitez is a great example. Heart is a big factor as well.

            By the way, welcome to boxingscene.com
            thanks for the welcome and input
            so basically it depends on which was the better fighter on the night of the fight. This makes much more sense because i have heard quite a few boxers say they lost to the better man that night and in my opinion that is very respectable

            Comment

            Working...
            TOP