Comments Thread For: Ch-ch-changes- BoxingScene’s Pound for Pound Top Ten

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • royjonesjrKTFO
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • May 2004
    • 1125
    • 32
    • 1
    • 12,803

    #41
    Top3 looks correct...everyone else is not P4P material. They're either very good or just good. For example, Paul Williams, he has poor defense, lacks punching power for his size, lacks boxing IQ (doesn't utilizes his height), etc.

    Comment

    • jrosales13
      undisputed champion
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Sep 2008
      • 32632
      • 738
      • 763
      • 40,023

      #42
      Originally posted by Spray_resistant
      I agree with many of the fighters on the list but don't agree with how they are arranged.
      I agree Moreno should be higher

      Chemitoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

      Comment

      • jrosales13
        undisputed champion
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Sep 2008
        • 32632
        • 738
        • 763
        • 40,023

        #43
        Originally posted by Mayweather_
        What the hell is Wlad doing there?

        Hes not even top 30.
        Now that is just hating

        Comment

        • komandante
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Jul 2008
          • 3579
          • 184
          • 14
          • 24,294

          #44
          What is Floyd doing at #1, this ranking is baseless and should be ignored

          Comment

          • komandante
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Jul 2008
            • 3579
            • 184
            • 14
            • 24,294

            #45
            This P4P listing is baseless, just follow the Ring listing for accuracy.

            Comment

            • jrosales13
              undisputed champion
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Sep 2008
              • 32632
              • 738
              • 763
              • 40,023

              #46
              Originally posted by komandante
              This P4P listing is baseless, just follow the Ring listing for accuracy.
              This P4P list is better than the ring list.

              Comment

              • jrosales13
                undisputed champion
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Sep 2008
                • 32632
                • 738
                • 763
                • 40,023

                #47
                Originally posted by royjonesjrKTFO
                Top3 looks correct...everyone else is not P4P material. They're either very good or just good. For example, Paul Williams, he has poor defense, lacks punching power for his size, lacks boxing IQ (doesn't utilizes his height), etc.
                After the top 3 is really wide open.

                Comment

                • crold1
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Apr 2005
                  • 6349
                  • 326
                  • 122
                  • 19,304

                  #48
                  Originally posted by jrosales13
                  After the top 3 is really wide open.
                  It reflects the sport getting younger or at least fresher. The old guard is almost all washed out. There's a broad new wave and it's largely made up of guys with a big win or two. Lots of talent but the proof will be over time.

                  Comment

                  • T.Horton
                    master chief = ****
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • Feb 2009
                    • 15412
                    • 1,374
                    • 2,610
                    • 28,331

                    #49
                    I cannot agree with Floyd being listed over Pacquiao but overall very nice piece to read.

                    Comment

                    • jrosales13
                      undisputed champion
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Sep 2008
                      • 32632
                      • 738
                      • 763
                      • 40,023

                      #50
                      Originally posted by crold1
                      It reflects the sport getting younger or at least fresher. The old guard is almost all washed out. There's a broad new wave and it's largely made up of guys with a big win or two. Lots of talent but the proof will be over time.
                      Yea a lot of guys are in a cusp of being in the top 10 or out of the top 10.

                      And, good list

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP