Mayweather has never fought a consistent Boxer......

[Dynamite Kid]

What is Zab doing wrong in this fight to not meet your characterization of a consistent boxer



Shall i keep posting video's?

What for, make yourself look more of a fool? Lol

The second video is precisely why Judah is not what your describing, he is leaving a big gap between him and the opponent and closing distance slowly and not letting his hands go much.

[IMDAZED]

fuck em judges they don't know how to appreciate slickness.

Yeah, just ask Pernell Whitaker.

[Tamis!]

They weren't but, to be fair, neither was Morales at that point and he moved back down. Raheem campaigned hard for the Pac bout and was willing to move down. I was pissed Morales got the rematch but, truth be told, I couldn't stand watching Raheem fight.

Yeah that's what I thought too, EM got the rematch in the end.

[Dynamite Kid]

Damn Was Leonard consistently aggressive throughout this fight?
Or waiting to counter and explode?

Nope, but its like i said, fighters adapt difference strategies for different opponents but people consider their style to be something that they do on a more consistent basis, which is usually what they are best at, in Mayweather's case, its to be defensive.

[Ishy Aytan]

Cause i had been responding to the Leonard-Mayweather thread and i started to realize something, that Mayweather has never really faced a fighter with that kind of style, and it would be interesting cause i dont think he would cope well with someone like that, obviously i did not anticipate little girls like you and Horus getting pissy, or maybe i did Lol, just goes to show what you guys are really like eh?

LOOOL, just to show what sort of poster you are my little friend. Because i seem to remember you once telling me that you would'nt give Floyd credit even if he had beaten both Cotto and Margarito.

So this thread is another one of your trolling on Floyd threads.

[Horus]

Nope, but its like i said, fighters adapt difference strategies for different opponents but people consider their style to be something that they do on a more consistent basis, which is usually what they are best at, in Mayweather's case, its to be defensive.

What do you consider Deigo Corralles?

[Tamis!]

LOOOL, just to show what sort of poster you are my little friend. Because i seem to remember you once telling me that you would'nt give Floyd credit even if he had beaten both Cotto and Margarito.

So this thread is another one of your trolling on Floyd threads.

Well the thread ain't bad at all TBF.

The only hold-up prolly is the standards and perception of people on what a "consistent" boxer is, which makes the debate interesting.

[Dynamite Kid]

What do you consider Deigo Corralles?

Dont know, he is a bit like Castillo i guess, bit of a hybrid between an slugger and a Boxer, but more of a slugger than an Boxer, although Corrales could! box, but that was when he learned to use his height more (Casamayor 2), however that came after his loss to Mayweather, that said, Corrales was not particularly quick either


Corrales also did not have many wrinkles to his game, his footwork was not particularly good either, he was kinda easy to read.

[brick wall]

Yeah, just ask Pernell Whitaker.

that's disrespectful...don't even compare raheem's fate with whitaker. raheem is not even half of whitaker's slickness. maybe it's about time you guys should remove raheem off your slick black fighters list.

[IMDAZED]

that's disrespectful...don't even compare raheem's fate with whitaker. raheem is not even half of whitaker's slickness. maybe it's about time you guys should remove raheem off your slick black fighters list.

Maybe it's time you use your brain. Please point out where I compared the two? Are you really that ******?