Comments Thread For: Mosley Breaks Down Why Mayweather-Pacquiao Fell Apart

[goldenglove2]

Yes indeed I will, and you have fun with your head buried in all that sand.

we can agree to disagree.....

[ALG United]

again, floyd accept mannys demands but pac didnt do the same.

funny how when manny gives demands, its ok. but when floyd does it, its wrong.

you *******s are thick

Floyd made most of the demands son, he initially requested for 154lbs and a bigger ring, ofcourse that will be turned down, obviously a ***** move from floyd. Then team manny demanded a stiffer penalty for every lbs over during the weigh in, which in turn is understandable because of how floyd have treated marquez at the weigh in.. Then finally floyd again demanded for OSDT....

[Slip Stream]

we can agree to disagree.....

True enough brother, there's room for all of our thoughts.

[jbpanama]

Sorry to burst your bubble friend since I have a rational brain, but what my brain is telling me is that Mosley would like to line up for a possible fight with Paquiao. He already got his ass kicked by Mayweather too convincingly for a rematch, so the other big meal ticket out there is Pacquiao. He won't get nearly as much money of course, and the fight will be at a catch-weight, but it's a meal ticket none-the-less.

Simply because "lotta ppl feel the same way" doesn't make it true homie, that's called argumentum ad populum which is a fallacious argument, that somehow because "lotta" people believe something it must be true. I'm sorry, but with all of these catch-weight titles floating around I can't look on this situation as favorably as you do.

SLIP is 2X2, SOMETIMES 5.....???
we don't need a quaram AMIGO!!!

[goldenglove2]

True enough brother, there's room for all of our thoughts.

wanna be best friends?

check _Yes or _No

[Slip Stream]

wanna be best friends?

check _Yes or _No

Sure why not.

Yes X

[del515]

Sorry to burst your bubble friend since I have a rational brain, but what my brain is telling me is that Mosley would like to line up for a possible fight with Paquiao. He already got his ass kicked by Mayweather too convincingly for a rematch, so the other big meal ticket out there is Pacquiao. He won't get nearly as much money of course, and the fight will be at a catch-weight, but it's a meal ticket none-the-less.

Simply because "lotta ppl feel the same way" doesn't make it true homie, that's called argumentum ad populum which is a fallacious argument, that somehow because "lotta" people believe something it must be true. I'm sorry, but with all of these catch-weight titles floating around I can't look on this situation as favorably as you do.

The problem with dictating a fallacy of argument via argumentum ad populum is that in this situation there is a lack of degree to which the validity of facts can be presented or offered. So seriously stop using the Rachel Maddows show to improve your lexicon of vocabulary because its an irritation to my eye seeing the use of "big words" improperly.

Whenever I do bash on Mayweather in my eyes I do place it with relative terms of the situation. For example:

1) drug testing via Olympic Style was called unnecessary and only warranted by Golden Boy Productions when it was requested years ago by Zab Judah during negotiations with Mosley. Therefore for GBP to warrant such a request for Mayweather therefore lacks legitimacy since you've predetermined it unnecessary. Since you like big words we'll call this a predicate fallacy.

2) the penalty on being over weight was warranted given he did so for his last fight against Marquez. The issue of drugs and PEDs has not been proven and has no bearing what so ever except for the opinion of Mayweather and his associates. Since there is actually no evidence, this is what we call communal reinforcement; where evidence is lacking reinforcement and its validation of truth only comes about through repetition of said opinions as facts despite lack of evidence.

3) despite whatever the purse split is, there is no denial that no matter who Mayweather fights, he cannot get more money fighting anyone else even with the A~side of a purse split than he can doing a 50/50 split with Pac. That is a fact. Given his moniker of "fighting for money" and the "money fights", then his refusal to accept the fight is a propositional fallacy of decidability implying that he will only accept fights granted the opponent in question is in fact allows him to maintain his status quo as is.

So you start using the big latin terms, feeling and pretending you're smart, you really aren't. Hearing a big buzz word from a show and using it simply means you learned something from the SAT's. Additionally I can see why you like Mayweather because you're posing to be some smart, gifted person who can see the truth as it really is and you can't and using big words like that doesn't do the job either.

In the end, Mayweather has 3 options: accept fight, reject fight, delay fight. it doesn't matter the terms, whether agreeable or not, those are his 3 decisions. When someone makes a continual excuse for one reason or another, then I say his actions speak louder than words. Roger and Floyd Sr. say PEDs aren't a problem? Well then what's the hold up if that's their real concern. Frankly I do believe innocent before guilty, call me American but this isn't the Salem With Trials and we're hunting for PEDs instead of witches.

You're Mayweather is a poser like you; you "try" to act smart, Mayweather tries to act as if he's unbeatable. Well then take the fight and put the argument to rest. Here's another big term and its called associative reasoning. It means implication of a truth through lack of reasoning. It means you can determine the truth regardless of evidence by eliminating options based on their viability. If he didn't wan't to fight Pac because of purse split, that'd be an option [but he didn't say that]. If he didn't want to fight because of his uncle that'd be an option [but he didn't say that]. If he wished to clear his legal matters before hand that'd be an option [but he didn't say that]. His course of reason presented to the public is "on vacation" which is both not reasonable nor legitimate of an excuse in light of all possible excuses. There the only thing logic dictates is he is afraid of something and unwilling to face it.

PS: Yea, seriously stop the latin words, I did teach logic as a graduate student and you're not even smart enough to use the term properly. It would only be an argumentum ad populum if there was a lack of supporting evidence and I've provided it. So "homie" what's your defense of Mayweather. Oh wait there is none, wasted question I asked.

[13oct1992]

Thats winning half of the battle

If that is what floyd wants then he has half of the battle already won, however, If Pacquiao is as confident as he has proved to be from time to time, **** take the test take the fight under any conditions and send this loud mouth SOB back to Vegas. That is if he can really do it, floyd is a lot to handle and people don't have a clue, keeping Mosley at the end of that jab just like many others who seem to think that Floyd has light hands is out of their mind, granted I think Pacquiao hits harder of the two, but floyd has been able to keep heavier guys out of range with his jab and full relocation of the opponents foots with out hem even knowing that they are the ones out of position, is a art form and floyd is a pure Picasso, and Manny is one one too, but with to many psychological disadvantages, and Floyd will exploit them all. they need to fight or get the f*** out of the sport.

[Ray*]

Floyd made most of the demands son, he initially requested for 154lbs and a bigger ring, ofcourse that will be turned down, obviously a ***** move from floyd. Then team manny demanded a stiffer penalty for every lbs over during the weigh in, which in turn is understandable because of how floyd have treated marquez at the weigh in.. Then finally floyd again demanded for OSDT....

So a fighter that only fought once at 150 would demand to have the fight at 154? And when did Mayweather demand the fight at 154 and a bigger ring? Because no one has ever confirm that odd demand, the only demand so far was the drug test from Mayweather's part... So where are you or anyone else getting those other "Demands" from?

[goldenglove2]

so a fighter that only fought once at 150 would demand to have the fight at 154? And when did mayweather demand the fight at 154 and a bigger ring? Because no one has ever confirm that odd demand, the only demand so far was the drug test from mayweather's part... So where are you or anyone else getting those other "demands" from?

smh.......................................