Doug Fischer: "Wlad Klitschko would've been dangerous to ANYBODY in history even Ali"

[street bully]

I think he beat Holyfield,Frazier,Bowe and Lyle...

Wlad is an horrible match up for Holyfield.

Bowe get outboxed bad,Bowe was good at outhustling brawlers,but Golota who was a skilled fighter with no balls,no brain and no chin showed skills beat Bowe.
Bowe wasn't in his prime,but not so far of his prime(Holyfield fights)when he faced Golota.

Lyle is in troubles,bad match up.Would look like Wlad vs Chambers.


Lewis KO Wlad.

Ali UD or KO Wlad,but the Ali of the great nights...

Prime Tyson KO Wlad when he starts to connect clean punches in the 4th,5th round.

Wlad is suposed to UD Foreman,but I think Foreman scores a KO in the mid rounds.

Frazier get trashed in 5 rounds by the Ukranian powerhouse.
Too short and not enough fast to connect on Wlad's jaw.

I agree with your post. Wlad is very good and would make easy work out of guys like Joe Louis, but Ali, Holmes, and Lewis all have longer reach and two of which were much faster, and one has the best chin in HW history.

[Bushbaby]

Wlad's stamina & chin aren't good enough to beat Ali,I'd definately give Vitali a better shot though!!1

[omarinbox]

When did Wlad fight Lewis?

Lewis>>>Holyfield, BTW.

Sorry, I meant Vitali...I agree Lewis is better than Holyfield but that was Lewis' last ever fight.

A prime Holyfield could deal with Wlad. It would be ugly and I would cheer for Wlad but still, the style Holyfield employs wins ugly fights.

[TRAV1$]

Wlad wouldn't be able to cope with Frazier's pressure
If he could get passed Ali's jab and land clean, he would get passed Wlads.

[Wlad Klitschko]

And besides Rahman, who had Sanders fought?

Check Ernie Terrell's stats as well as Cleveland Williams. And quit talking out of your backside.

holmes fought norton in 1978 not 80's...past prime but still good. and so what if shavers lost to a fighter with a losing record before he fought holmes? wlad lost to that bum purrity by ko...what does that make of wlad? he lost again by ko to sanders and brewsters...both have losses in their records before they fought wlad. you know what the difference is? holmes defeated shavers by ko whereas wlad got his ass kicked by purrity, sanders and brewster.

Wait your post dont make no sense at all.

Norton was way past it, started to barely show up for fights. Shavers lost to a fighter with a LOSING record. No the 2 loss Corrie Sanders, no a guy who lost more than he had won. Shavers lost to stallings in shavers' prime. You are going to count a Wlad loss to Purrity where he was on his 12th fight in 12 months and got tired.

Ali lost to Berbick, berbick was trash. How can you think Wlad would lose to Ali?

See what happens, you can play the prime game but no one else can right?

Ali was floored bya 185 lbs journeyman. Wait? before prime right?

Outta here joke.

[Wlad Klitschko]

Bro Wlad is a good underrted fighteer, but saying he is bigger than Tirell is a joke. He weighed 10 pounds (of fat) more than Tirell, and if he was in the type of shape Tirell was in he would have been a cruiserweight. HWs back then had to come in the shape of their lives to go 15 rounds, which seperates then men from the boys. A few pound sof fat does not make you bigger. Tirell was built like a brick house, and if he was out of shape he would have been over 260 pounds, bu surley he would be better at 215 ripped an ready then he would have been all flabby like Sanders.

i stopped reading when you said hws back then had to come in shape. Youve clearly never heard of Buster Mathis. Also Sanders wasnt 10 lbs of fat. Calling Terrell ripped...red k. Terrell was skinny and not very good and Sanders would have floored him.

[Wlad Klitschko]

Bro Wlad is a good underrted fighteer, but saying he is bigger than Tirell is a joke. He weighed 10 pounds (of fat) more than Tirell, and if he was in the type of shape Tirell was in he would have been a cruiserweight. HWs back then had to come in the shape of their lives to go 15 rounds, which seperates then men from the boys. A few pound sof fat does not make you bigger. Tirell was built like a brick house, and if he was out of shape he would have been over 260 pounds, bu surley he would be better at 215 ripped an ready then he would have been all flabby like Sanders.

Haha and if Terrell was built like brick house than Wlad is not human. Wlad is the same height with 40 more lbs of rock hard muscle, so what is he built like? Whata re you even talking about? And weight=mass, and can definitely help the velocity of your punches and size can do a ton in a clinch... Who clinched a ton? Oh yeah...Ali.

[TRAV1$]

Haha and if Terrell was built like brick house than Wlad is not human. Wlad is the same height with 40 more lbs of rock hard muscle, so what is he built like? Whata re you even talking about? And weight=mass, and can definitely help the velocity of your punches and size can do a ton in a clinch... Who clinched a ton? Oh yeah...Ali.

Weight = mass x gravity, mate.

[Wlad Klitschko]

Weight = mass x gravity, mate.

yeah...find the constant there.

[street bully]

i stopped reading when you said hws back then had to come in shape. Youve clearly never heard of Buster Mathis. Also Sanders wasnt 10 lbs of fat. Calling Terrell ripped...red k. Terrell was skinny and not very good and Sanders would have floored him.

You can red k me all you want, but Sanders is flabby around the middle and is only good for the first 4 rounds BECAUSE HE ISN"T IN SHAPE hence why he gasses. I like Wlad and rate him more than most, but you seem a little too attatched. I try to be realistic with my arguments.