..A great fighter and a very good fighter.
How would you define..
Collapse
-
Tags: None
-
-
-
I would put it the oppisite.Originally posted by USA4LIFEDLH is great
Trinidad is very good
DLH is great b/c he's not one demensional, Trini is, nuff said.
Trinidad winning his fights undisputed, and owning the most defenses of welterweight history, against grade A fighters,
where DLH is just good, but threw up alot of food to fight at Super Featherweight, moving up devsions like he had ants in his pants, while getting a bunch of gifts along the way.Last edited by IwatchBoxing; 07-22-2005, 09:37 PM.Comment
-
a great fighter wins over a very good fighter.lol. i mean, great fighters wins on big fights, while very good fighters fall short one time or another.Comment
-
I haven't agreed with a few of the examples on this thread, but here's my take.
Trinidad and DLH were both greats. Trinidad was the best welter of the mid-late 90's and DLH has an excellent resume himself. Those guys are equal in my book.
Chavez great - Castillo very good
Morales great - Pacquiao very good (that could change though)
Jones great - McClellan very goodComment
-
nicely put.Originally posted by oldgringoI haven't agreed with a few of the examples on this thread, but here's my take.
Trinidad and DLH were both greats. Trinidad was the best welter of the mid-late 90's and DLH has an excellent resume himself. Those guys are equal in my book.
Chavez great - Castillo very good
Morales great - Pacquiao very good (that could change though)
Jones great - McClellan very good
Comment
to your mom..
Comment