The Klitschko's have every reason to demand a rematch clause

[Wlad Klitschko]

Im sick of people talking about how the contracts have rematch clauses. The most recent one apparently did not, but even if it did, tons of fighters have rematch clauses when they are the champ. Its pretty standard, boilerplate stuff. Pavlik had a rematch clause with Martinez...was he making Martinez a slave? Dawson had rematch clauses...is he a slave owner? Dear god. All you have to do is look at the fact the Kltischko's have been trying to get Haye into the ring for 20 months and cant get a contract to see why theyd want one. If he did beat Vitali, do you really want him pulling all this crap on Wlad? or vice versa. If hes getting 50/50 for each fight who cares. Heck if its close to 50/50 who cares, he isnt the champion. He beat a guy who shouldnt have had a belt anyways. If Haye was easier to deal with, ok, but do you really want him to win a SD over Wlad or something and then saying im going to take a year off, then fight Fraudley and then maybe fight Vitali. Heck, and if he did beat a brother you know hed ask for 70% in a match with the other.

Im not saying Haye would win, i dont think he would, but in a ring stranger things have happened. Im just saying, based on how hard he is to deal with the brothers should put a rematch clause on there so he is either forced to fight them or retire and enough of this nonsense.

[Gorilla Dogs]

yea nice name............

[Wlad Klitschko]

yea nice name............

yeah i dont know how it wasnt taken. I figured everyone on here would want Wlad Klitschko as their name.

[ИATAS]

A rematch clause is one thing and is all fine and dandy, having like 2 rematch clauses and one of those rematchess being with the brother of said fighter is something completely different and crazy!

Now of course, I don't wtf was in the most recent contract, but I believe that was the first go around.

[Gorilla Dogs]

yeah i dont know how it wasnt taken. I figured everyone on here would want Wlad Klitschko as their name.

lol yea man 99.9% of those names are taken haha

[Wlad Klitschko]

A rematch clause is one thing and is all fine and dandy, having like 2 rematch clauses and one of those rematchess being with the brother of said fighter is something completely different and crazy!

Now of course, I don't wtf was in the most recent contract, but I believe that was the first go around.

Heres my point. Haye fans always say "hayes just being a good business man" when he backs out of negotiations. Now would a smart businessman put them in position to give haye the upperhand. If Haye beats one Klitschko, he easily could dodge and refuse the other and hold over their head he had a win. Lets just say Vitali got Chris Byrded and hurt himself in the ring. Haye got 50/50 before, whats he going to ask now that he has 2 belts?

Haye fans think its so great for Haye to be a good business man. But its wrong for the klitshcko's to even be competant business men.

[Russian Crushin]

Im sick of people talking about how the contracts have rematch clauses. The most recent one apparently did not, but even if it did, tons of fighters have rematch clauses when they are the champ. Its pretty standard, boilerplate stuff. Pavlik had a rematch clause with Martinez...was he making Martinez a slave? Dawson had rematch clauses...is he a slave owner? Dear god. All you have to do is look at the fact the Kltischko's have been trying to get Haye into the ring for 20 months and cant get a contract to see why theyd want one. If he did beat Vitali, do you really want him pulling all this crap on Wlad? or vice versa. If hes getting 50/50 for each fight who cares. Heck if its close to 50/50 who cares, he isnt the champion. He beat a guy who shouldnt have had a belt anyways. If Haye was easier to deal with, ok, but do you really want him to win a SD over Wlad or something and then saying im going to take a year off, then fight Fraudley and then maybe fight Vitali. Heck, and if he did beat a brother you know hed ask for 70% in a match with the other.

Im not saying Haye would win, i dont think he would, but in a ring stranger things have happened. Im just saying, based on how hard he is to deal with the brothers should put a rematch clause on there so he is either forced to fight them or retire and enough of this nonsense.

I may be a little lost but wheres this all coming from? Is there news about the proposed contracts?

[odogg8121]

A rematch clause is one thing and is all fine and dandy, having like 2 rematch clauses and one of those rematchess being with the brother of said fighter is something completely different and crazy!

Now of course, I don't wtf was in the most recent contract, but I believe that was the first go around.

Your spot on; thats what thier contract are like. if i cant beat you then hopfully my bro can so that way we still keep all the belt....and since you signed you have to fight us. Just think the fighter that signs that and wins, will be fight the Klits for atleast a year before he gets a new foe...

[j.one]

A clause that makes the man fight your brother and then you again is ****ing absurd, there ****'s.

[Wlad Klitschko]

A clause that makes the man fight your brother and then you again is ****ing absurd, there ****'s.

Not really. A 50/50 contract with a lineal hw champ who holds multiple belts, and who packs stadiums and has been dominating the division for half a decade and is going to be going on double digit defenses against a guy who got a UD against Valuev, beat 52 year old John Ruiz, and beat a starved and lifeless monte barrett...now thats crazy. Have to do 2 rematches so that he cant hold the belts hostage, thats practical. Who would be more deserving of a fight besides another Klitshcko. If Haye did beat Vitali, who would the best HW be for him to take on. Should he fight arreola? Adamek...or how about Wlad. this prevents him from further being a *****.