no way the jmm vs pac ppv did less than 500k i believe. marg vs pac will do min 750k and min 50k in dallas.
Dude look at me for example. If they do fight in Arlington. Myself will be contributing like over $1000 to the economy there. Hotel, food, tickets, etc. And that's just me. Imagine more people??
Do they REALLY want to give this away?? They'd be ****** to do so.
Pac-Marg would definetely make more money. Mayweather-JMM only made 1mil PPV. I see Pac-Marg easily eclipsing 1mil buys.
At this point in their careers, Pac easily bests JMM at 140, let alone 147.
Let JMM retire as top 10 p4p.
You're pinoy so your biased opinion doesn't matter, JMM at 140 has a better chance at beating Pacquiao than Margarito at 150.
How does Pacquiao vs Marg make more PPV sales? Last time I heard here in Tijuana everyone believes he's getting knocked out and 'aint really excited for the fight .
You're pinoy so your biased opinion doesn't matter, JMM at 140 has a better chance at beating Pacquiao than Margarito at 150.
How does Pacquiao vs Marg make more PPV sales? Last time I heard here in Tijuana everyone believes he's getting knocked out and 'aint really excited for the fight .
JMM at 140 is a joke. He barely beat Diaz, who is borderline bum. The current top 10 JWW's will easily knock JMM the **** out.
Pac-Marg will easily make over 1mil buys. Put all your points on the line and let's make a wager.
It's a combination of GBP and Nacho Beristein (dude screwed Marquez out of a 3rd fight a while back) who are ****in it up for Marquez.
If I'm Marquez I would take a 70-30 split in favor of Pacquiao, and try to beat him solely for legacy.
You can't chase down a fight and expect 50-50, so until Marquez tells Beristein and GBP to STFU and just make the fight, he will never get Manny.
I mean they turned down a third fight, went to John's backyard, and lost a decision. To top it off Marquez fought for peanuts when even a 20% split in Manny's favor would have been way more than the John fight.
I like Marquez, but those around him are killing it for him.
Comment