Did Froch really beat Pascal?

[BetterCallSaul]

Dawson is better than Froch though, a lot better. Dawson is also much better than klessler. Styles make fights man, and I think Dawson qwould make mince meat out of Froch over 12. He comes in in straight lines and can be hit very easily too.

Dawson is a much better boxer. But to be a top boxer you can't just box, you need to fight. Dawson doesn't have a warrior mentality. I'm not going to debate who would win out of Froch or Dawson, because the fight isn't even on the radar. All I am going to say is, Froch has made slickish boxers look bad before. And I don't even think Dawson is as good as Taylor, Dirrell, or Pascal.

[NorvernRob]

Anyone who had Pascal winning that fight should have their internet cut off for good. It wasn't even debatable.

[BetterCallSaul]

one thing i do bet. is that froch wont be winning the second time around



and im NOT being biased

I love Pascal. I even had a picture taken of me and him before the Froch-Dirrell fight, and I asked him when was he going to knock Dawson out. This was before a fight with Dawson was on the cards. He just laughed.

Pascal is a great boxer, but definitively stating 'he will' beat Froch, when he lost by a wide margin last time out is not a smart conclusion.

[D-MiZe]

I love Pascal. I even had a picture taken of me and him before the Froch-Dirrell fight, and I asked him when was he going to knock Dawson out. This was before a fight with Dawson was on the cards. He just laughed.

Pascal is a great boxer, but definitively stating 'he will' beat Froch, when he lost by a wide margin last time out is not a smart conclusion.

Dogs is new to boxing, go easy on him.

[Rosseboi]

Froch did beat him convincingly and even on neutral ground he would have won, maybe via SD.

What's most important is Pascal said Froch won but this is not surprising since Pascal is a throwback fighter to the old days where pride and honour meant something in the ring. And this is why the UK has 'adopted' him.

Pascal = good for boxing