the margarito that beat cotto would neva lose to pacquiao!!!

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • carlos slim
    Banned
    • Mar 2010
    • 1033
    • 142
    • 7
    • 1,252

    #1

    the margarito that beat cotto would neva lose to pacquiao!!!

    the aztec warrior who sacrificed pain to stop puerto rican sensation in 11 round would not be denied by the pilipino menace!!! the margarito that fought that nite had the will, volume, footwork closing & chin to beat pac....lets reminince....
  • Heeb
    Day Man
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Mar 2010
    • 5236
    • 209
    • 355
    • 12,515

    #2
    He sure as hell lacks the speed to beat Pacquiao.

    Comment

    • NesNY
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Apr 2010
      • 1603
      • 74
      • 26
      • 7,728

      #3
      he has no chance. what he does have, most likely, are orders.
      in-house fight. Pacquiao involved. Arum involved. you do the math.

      I present to you, exhibit A - Pacquiao/Clottey. this fight's outcome is already known.

      Comment

      • Marduke
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • May 2007
        • 1130
        • 30
        • 10
        • 7,308

        #4
        You're right. I bet just about anyone would have problems being punched with plaster wraps.

        Comment

        • Marduke
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • May 2007
          • 1130
          • 30
          • 10
          • 7,308

          #5
          Originally posted by NesNY
          he has no chance. what he does have, most likely, are orders.
          in-house fight. Pacquiao involved. Arum involved. you do the math.

          I present to you, exhibit A - Pacquiao/Clottey. this fight's outcome is already known.
          Will you shut the **** up? I'm tired of people making excuses about everything.

          So since Pacquiao and Arum are involved, obviously the fight is fixed.

          Give the dude some ****ing credit.


          So if Arum fixes fights for Pacquiao, how come his only recent loss is against another Top Rank boxer (Erik Morales)?

          Comment

          • NesNY
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Apr 2010
            • 1603
            • 74
            • 26
            • 7,728

            #6
            Originally posted by Marduke
            Will you shut the **** up? I'm tired of people making excuses about everything.

            So since Pacquiao and Arum are involved, obviously the fight is fixed.

            Give the dude some ****ing credit.


            So if Arum fixes fights for Pacquiao, how come his only recent loss is against another Top Rank boxer (Erik Morales)?
            what excuses?

            Morales happened in 2005.....when Manny's best fights were a controversial Draw with JMM, and a win over Barrera. Pacquiao wasn't the draw back then. Actually, he wasn't supposed to beat JMM, Barrera or Morales in the first place.

            And an even better question.....why have his last 3 fights been in-house? I can think of at least ONE crooked multi-millionaire businessman who can answer that question.
            Last edited by NesNY; 08-16-2010, 06:49 PM.

            Comment

            • BillyBoxing
              Undisputed Champion
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Apr 2009
              • 7454
              • 488
              • 62
              • 50,228

              #7
              Originally posted by carlos slim
              the aztec warrior who sacrificed pain to stop puerto rican sensation in 11 round would not be denied by the pilipino menace!!! the margarito that fought that nite had the will, volume, footwork closing & chin to beat pac....lets reminince....
              Sure Pac has the speed,power,footwork,akward style,southpaw stance,elusiveness to beat that Margo...

              That Margo is two times slower than Pac,he could connect on a flat footed and average speed Cotto,but not a fast fighter like Pacquiao...while Margo throws a jab,Pacquiao has the time to throw a 5 punches combo.

              Margo is goin to hit the air and get punished.

              Comment

              • pinkivory
                Interim Champion
                Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                • Jun 2009
                • 709
                • 22
                • 6
                • 12,225

                #8
                Originally posted by carlos slim
                the aztec warrior who sacrificed pain to stop puerto rican sensation in 11 round would not be denied by the pilipino menace!!! the margarito that fought that nite had the will, volume, footwork closing & chin to beat pac....lets reminince....
                If Marg wants to be the fighter that he was that night, When he goes back to apply for his license in California, he should ask them if they could give him his wraps back.

                Comment

                • Marduke
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • May 2007
                  • 1130
                  • 30
                  • 10
                  • 7,308

                  #9
                  Originally posted by NesNY
                  what excuses?

                  Morales happened in 2005.....when Manny's best fights were a controversial Draw with JMM, and a win over Barrera. Pacquiao wasn't the draw back then. Actually, he wasn't supposed to beat JMM, Barrera or Morales in the first place.

                  And an even better question.....why have his last 3 fights been in-house? I can think of at least ONE crooked multi-millionaire businessman who can answer that question.
                  It's just ALWAYS something with the ****** here on NSB. Pac's taking PEDs, Mayweather is ducking, Pac's fight is fixed, Mayweather's fight is fixed.

                  Just give it a ****ing rest.

                  It's not ****ing rocket science why Arum prefers to have both fighters under his banner...he makes more money. There's nothing shady about that at all. He's just doing what promoters do.

                  But what the **** does that have to do with fixing fights?

                  Exactly, now shut the **** up.

                  Comment

                  • NesNY
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Apr 2010
                    • 1603
                    • 74
                    • 26
                    • 7,728

                    #10
                    Can you go a few sentences without blabbering profanities?
                    You're probably young so you're kind of excused.

                    Boxing is, was, and will always be shady. It's because of the politics, as it is in ALL the business world. Don't be such an imbecile to think that a sport as corrupt as boxing has been for over a hundred years is suddenly devoid of all su****ion.

                    I know this much.....

                    If I were Bob Arum, and I had a "cash cow", my highest PPV draw, I'd make sure to keep him there by all means possible. This includes, but is not limited to, keeping the fight in-house and having a "favorable" result (ie. my cash cow wins).

                    Only a naive fool suspects no one.

                    Oh....and btw....I'll be making money bets on the next Pacquiao fights. Care to make one?

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP