the aztec warrior who sacrificed pain to stop puerto rican sensation in 11 round would not be denied by the pilipino menace!!! the margarito that fought that nite had the will, volume, footwork closing & chin to beat pac....lets reminince....
the margarito that beat cotto would neva lose to pacquiao!!!
Collapse
-
-
Will you shut the **** up? I'm tired of people making excuses about everything.
So since Pacquiao and Arum are involved, obviously the fight is fixed.
Give the dude some ****ing credit.
So if Arum fixes fights for Pacquiao, how come his only recent loss is against another Top Rank boxer (Erik Morales)?Comment
-
what excuses?Will you shut the **** up? I'm tired of people making excuses about everything.
So since Pacquiao and Arum are involved, obviously the fight is fixed.
Give the dude some ****ing credit.
So if Arum fixes fights for Pacquiao, how come his only recent loss is against another Top Rank boxer (Erik Morales)?
Morales happened in 2005.....when Manny's best fights were a controversial Draw with JMM, and a win over Barrera. Pacquiao wasn't the draw back then. Actually, he wasn't supposed to beat JMM, Barrera or Morales in the first place.
And an even better question.....why have his last 3 fights been in-house? I can think of at least ONE crooked multi-millionaire businessman who can answer that question.Last edited by NesNY; 08-16-2010, 06:49 PM.Comment
-
Sure Pac has the speed,power,footwork,akward style,southpaw stance,elusiveness to beat that Margo...
That Margo is two times slower than Pac,he could connect on a flat footed and average speed Cotto,but not a fast fighter like Pacquiao...while Margo throws a jab,Pacquiao has the time to throw a 5 punches combo.
Margo is goin to hit the air and get punished.Comment
-
If Marg wants to be the fighter that he was that night, When he goes back to apply for his license in California, he should ask them if they could give him his wraps back.
Comment
-
It's just ALWAYS something with the ****** here on NSB. Pac's taking PEDs, Mayweather is ducking, Pac's fight is fixed, Mayweather's fight is fixed.what excuses?
Morales happened in 2005.....when Manny's best fights were a controversial Draw with JMM, and a win over Barrera. Pacquiao wasn't the draw back then. Actually, he wasn't supposed to beat JMM, Barrera or Morales in the first place.
And an even better question.....why have his last 3 fights been in-house? I can think of at least ONE crooked multi-millionaire businessman who can answer that question.
Just give it a ****ing rest.
It's not ****ing rocket science why Arum prefers to have both fighters under his banner...he makes more money. There's nothing shady about that at all. He's just doing what promoters do.
But what the **** does that have to do with fixing fights?
Exactly, now shut the **** up.Comment
-
Can you go a few sentences without blabbering profanities?
You're probably young so you're kind of excused.
Boxing is, was, and will always be shady. It's because of the politics, as it is in ALL the business world. Don't be such an imbecile to think that a sport as corrupt as boxing has been for over a hundred years is suddenly devoid of all su****ion.
I know this much.....
If I were Bob Arum, and I had a "cash cow", my highest PPV draw, I'd make sure to keep him there by all means possible. This includes, but is not limited to, keeping the fight in-house and having a "favorable" result (ie. my cash cow wins).
Only a naive fool suspects no one.
Oh....and btw....I'll be making money bets on the next Pacquiao fights. Care to make one?Comment
Comment