...the benefit of the doubt in P4P lists?
The most respected boxing media in the world all rests in the USA, this site for example is American with a high majority of posters American. And this influences our -Americans and the rest of the world alike-take on whos good and whos better.
It is of my opinion that, to a certain degree, with give Americans boxers the benefit of the doubt when it comes to ranking them. By this i mean they dont have to prove themselves compared to other boxers, we just assume they deserve their place.
For example Chad Dawson was very high on alot of lists when he had done very little to warrant that spot. His last four fights before Pascal were againest 40 somethings who were no where near the P4P lists.
Devon Alexander was also highly regarded after his win over Urango. I saw some people rank him as high as #3. I think the Kotelnik fight has brought some sense into most people. He is young and has plenty of time to get into the top ten in the world but right now he is not there yet. You wouldnt see anyone put Khan into their top 10. Kotelnik would have struggled to make most people top 50s before that fight.
Ward as well is another young fighter who i expect to makes splashes the the P4P pool soonish but i beleive people are rushing to put him in there. A win over that version of Kessler does not warrant a P4P place. If he wins the super 6, or perhaps mybe just his next fight i wouldnt have any problems him being there. But i think he caught Kessler on a bad night who hadnt looked good in fights leading upto the fight. we wouldnt put Pascal in our top 10, would we?
This may just seem like an over-reaction to recent fights but i do really beleive they expose the flaws in our ranking system. we had other examples over the years like Pavlik who just should have not have been ranked the way they were.
So do you agree or am I just a yank basher?
The most respected boxing media in the world all rests in the USA, this site for example is American with a high majority of posters American. And this influences our -Americans and the rest of the world alike-take on whos good and whos better.
It is of my opinion that, to a certain degree, with give Americans boxers the benefit of the doubt when it comes to ranking them. By this i mean they dont have to prove themselves compared to other boxers, we just assume they deserve their place.
For example Chad Dawson was very high on alot of lists when he had done very little to warrant that spot. His last four fights before Pascal were againest 40 somethings who were no where near the P4P lists.
Devon Alexander was also highly regarded after his win over Urango. I saw some people rank him as high as #3. I think the Kotelnik fight has brought some sense into most people. He is young and has plenty of time to get into the top ten in the world but right now he is not there yet. You wouldnt see anyone put Khan into their top 10. Kotelnik would have struggled to make most people top 50s before that fight.
Ward as well is another young fighter who i expect to makes splashes the the P4P pool soonish but i beleive people are rushing to put him in there. A win over that version of Kessler does not warrant a P4P place. If he wins the super 6, or perhaps mybe just his next fight i wouldnt have any problems him being there. But i think he caught Kessler on a bad night who hadnt looked good in fights leading upto the fight. we wouldnt put Pascal in our top 10, would we?
This may just seem like an over-reaction to recent fights but i do really beleive they expose the flaws in our ranking system. we had other examples over the years like Pavlik who just should have not have been ranked the way they were.
So do you agree or am I just a yank basher?
Comment