Did Pascal win or did Dawson lose?

[KlownvonnomaD]

Well I think some of you missed the point I was trying to make.
I know Pascal won, I just watched it, I wasn't arguing that.

The point I was trying to make was that alot of round Pascal won, he won not because he was landing good clean punches, or bossing the ring. But simply because Dawson wasn't just following him around and watching him, instead of throwing the jab at him.

Now maybe it did just go to show that Dawson isn't ready to be considered in the top p4p rankings, where he wants to be.
Although I still stand by my comment that in a rematch I think Dawson wont make the same mistake again (and if he does he really is as rubbish as alot of you claim).

[Crazylegs77]

Well I think some of you missed the point I was trying to make.
I know Pascal won, I just watched it, I wasn't arguing that.

The point I was trying to make was that alot of round Pascal won, he won not because he was landing good clean punches, or bossing the ring. But simply because Dawson wasn't just following him around and watching him, instead of throwing the jab at him.

Now maybe it did just go to show that Dawson isn't ready to be considered in the top p4p rankings, where he wants to be.
Although I still stand by my comment that in a rematch I think Dawson wont make the same mistake again (and if he does he really is as rubbish as alot of you claim).

I see. So your saying Dawson lost on purpose. Interesting, but his reaction to losing would suggest otherwise.

[Main Source]

boxing is a funny sport how Carl Froch took Pascal to hell and back and Dawson could barely land anything of significance despite being by far the better boxer

i know styles make fights and all that but i would've never expected that

i bet the cobra is smiling after last night lol

That was a completely different fight. There was no feeling out process from the beginning. Froch let his hands go from the first bell and Pascal was forced to throw back.

Dawson didn't do anything of real significance. He had a lot of opportunities but after landing clean shots and clearly hurting Pascal he just took two steps back and started all over again from zero instead of just letting his hands go.

Eddie Muhammad did a good job and told everything Chad needed to know. But Chad wasn't up for it tonight.

[Main Source]

So your saying Dawson lost on purpose.

Now where does that come from? He didn't write that.

[BetterCallSaul]

Dawson didn't let his hands go because he doesn't have a warrior mentality, and hasn't fought nothing but old and shot fighters for the last two years.

Pascal is quick, has good movement, and punches hard. Dawson couldn't deal with him. He didn't lose because he didn't let his punches go. He lost because Pascal is the better fighter, and didn't allow him to get away with the things that he does against lesser fighters.

Dawson shouldn't have been in the top 10 p4p, let alone the top 5. Pascal is a good boxer, but he is very beatable. Dawson just isn't that great. Another overrated boxer who did little to deserve such high regard.

[AKATheMack]

Pascal won the fight by throwing punches. Who woulda guessed that was the way to win a boxing match? Dawson is full of talent, but after last nights performance I think he gets beat by Dirrell and Ward.

[Uturn]

Dawson lost it for himself in those early rounds because of his lack of work rate, he should have been taking the fight to Pascal as soon as that bell ringed. No excuses for Chad, he was extremely sloppy and laclusture in there. Chad will be back though.

[Piper the Great]

Pause

Chad forgot to say "no ****" for wearing shorts with condom depot on his ass. He lost soon as he put them on.

[Franco2012]

PASCAL won 10 rounds to 1 ,if you forget that 1 hail mary from Dawson in round 11 then Pascal won 11 rounds to none!

[Dave Rado]

I see. So your saying Dawson lost on purpose. Interesting, but his reaction to losing would suggest otherwise.

Are you illiterate? Where did the TS say that Dawson lost on purpose???