Yeah Calzaghe did always find a way to win, if Jones and Hopkins were younger they would have destroyed Calzaghe! He was almosted KO'D vs a 44 year old Hopkins.
No he wouldn't have. Last night's Dawson is not the same Dawson we usually see. Calzaghe would have had his hands full, but probably found a way to win.
I agree, dawson is a very good fighter on the outside so that makes it tough for calzaghe, but he would have found a way, dawson gets unsettled by educated pressure
no dawson would beat that version of hopkins based on activity and workrate/speed, seriously who else is there on calzaghes resume that dawson couldnt beat, Kessler? lol
Eubank woulda beat Dawson that night,that's for sure...
Yeah Calzaghe did always find a way to win, if Jones and Hopkins were younger they would have destroyed Calzaghe! He was almosted KO'D vs a 44 year old Hopkins.
He wasn't even close to getting ko'd by hopkins, jones came closer and even then calzaghe's head cleared in a matter of seconds. I think both guys probably beat him prime for prime, but that is no slander on calzaghe, prime jones destroyed james toney who himself is a legitmately great fighter. Hopkins was still a great fighter the night he fought calzaghe, not far from his best people always use the age thing as an excuse...use your eyes and actually see the fighter that is in the ring, more fans should rely on their own judgement rather than go along with general opinion. No one rips margarito for losing to a 36 year old mosley, why? Because he looked great and won.
Yeah Calzaghe did always find a way to win, if Jones and Hopkins were younger they would have destroyed Calzaghe! He was almosted KO'D vs a 44 year old Hopkins.
calzaghe was old himself so thats a weak excuse imo
Yeah Calzaghe did always find a way to win, if Jones and Hopkins were younger they would have destroyed Calzaghe! He was almosted KO'D vs a 44 year old Hopkins.
Comment