The biggest winner tonight might be Carl Froch

[lparm]

What about the past-prime Kessler then? Who beat Froch. He must be #1 in both smw and lhw in your mind, right!?

What a ******ed statement. Kessler holding a win over Froch doesn't make him the man at 168. Everyone outside Denmark knows Froch was the biggest victim of a robbery since Whitaker-JCC. Most fans don't even count that as a loss for Carl. Bad logic brah

[-Lucas-]

um yeah look at their careers. Froch is almost a household name world wide and Pascal is barely known even in Canada. Don't make me laugh

Lol
Is this nuthugging clown serious....

Froch can't even get any of his fights shown on any major broadcasting company in the UK and you say hes a household name. Hes barely known outside his own household.

Even when he fought Taylor, the fight wasnt shown live anywhere in the UK.

[Bring It On]

What a ******ed statement. Kessler holding a win over Froch doesn't make him the man at 168. Everyone outside Denmark knows Froch was the biggest victim of a robbery since Whitaker-JCC. Most fans don't even count that as a loss for Carl. Bad logic brah

Jesus Christ... Are you for real? You made the statement that Froch was argueably 2-3 at both 168 and 175 because he beat Pascal. By using that logic I thought you would have Kessler first or AT LEAST second.

And the robbery-part, omfg. I guess most members on this board are Danish then, huh?

http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/showthread.php?t=380065

74% thought Kessler won.

[TRAV1$]

Dawson would be all over Froch.

[Uturn]

Froch is clearly the real deal.

[REMOVED SHARK 97]

It would be hilarious reading the excuses If Froch KO's Abraham..

[T-97]

Here come the fanboys looking to defend Pascal. Does anyone have to remind you Froch won 10 arguably 11 of the 12 rounds when they fought. Pascal is the man at lt heavy, right? and Froch owned him, so....you see where this is going?

I was thinking the same thing, kind of. I don't think Froch should be considered a top contender at LHW, but I do agree that with every win Pascal gets, Froch's win looks more impressive. However, from what I remember, no way in hell did Froch win 10 of the 12 round against Pascal, it was a close fight, and I think Pascal would win a rematch.

[Rome-By-Ko]

Here come the fanboys looking to defend Pascal. Does anyone have to remind you Froch won 10 arguably 11 of the 12 rounds when they fought. Pascal is the man at lt heavy, right? and Froch owned him, so....you see where this is going?

I love Froch but he did not own Pascal..That was a close fight..

[lparm]

Jesus Christ... Are you for real? You made the statement that Froch was argueably 2-3 at both 168 and 175 because he beat Pascal. By using that logic I thought you would have Kessler first or AT LEAST second.

And the robbery-part, omfg. I guess most members on this board are Danish then, huh?

http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/showthread.php?t=380065

74% thought Kessler won.

And that's your proof ******amale? A subjective poll voted on by Froch haters. I suppose we should just start a poll for *****s only asking who they think the current p4p #1 is. I bet you could use that as proof too huh.

[Rome-By-Ko]

Dawson would be all over Froch.

Not that Dawson who fought last night.He would clearly lose to Froch IMO..