Tweet
i think all the trash talking and arrogance has left him cornered where he has to win in every fight. I think this is the reason he is not willing to fight pac because the mosley fight showed him that he is not impregnable and he can get knocked out. I think he realises pac has a shot and he doesn't want to take the risk. What other reason is there apart from his father making him shook.
-
-
there you go again w/ 'manny, through his camp' ****. pls provide a link that manny himself refused shane. roach can go on and on w/ his interviews but is he speaking for manny always? you *****s always bash his interviews but when something is useful to bash pac, you take it as gospel and even go as far to say that he's speaking for manny. cherrypicking really is a trait for floyd and his cults
Comment
-
Floyd will not want to be KO'd ever.
High lights of that would hurt him too much.
Losing to a UD will be very close since I can't see too many taking rounds from him so maybe it could be a roberry.
Losing to a KO, any excuse you want, but it's clear you got KTFO.Comment
-
I'm not one of those people. Like I said there is no video I know of where manny refuses the fight. If you HONESTLY believe roach wasn't speaking for manny then IMO you are either:there you go again w/ 'manny, through his camp' ****. pls provide a link that manny himself refused shane. roach can go on and on w/ his interviews but is he speaking for manny always? you *****s always bash his interviews but when something is useful to bash pac, you take it as gospel and even go as far to say that he's speaking for manny. cherrypicking really is a trait for floyd and his cults
a. playing games
b. a ****ing idiot ****svcker who actually thinks roach, who works for manny, was somehow off record and not talking for manny when being videotaped ABOUT manny's next fight during training camp.
c. someone who ALSO believes floyd sr. WASN'T speaking for floyd when he accussed manny of PED use (which clearly isn't true based on other posts)
I hope its a.Comment
-
so when floydsr said he doesnt like southpaws, was he speaking ALSO for jr? do you think floydjr would even say that?
when Sr first accused manny or peds, Jr was nowhere yet on the roid accusation scene. he was speaking for himself at that time.
you think ppl now cant grant interviews and speak for themselves?
see where that leaves you? you want to come up w/ your theories and try generalize or make some ****** pattern to them yet you end up making a fool of yourself. LOL.Comment
-
I'm talking about you and how you analyze and interpret it the statement from roach.so when floydsr said he doesnt like southpaws, was he speaking ALSO for jr? do you think floydjr would even say that?
when Sr first accused manny or peds, Jr was nowhere yet on the roid accusation scene. he was speaking for himself at that time.
you think ppl now cant grant interviews and speak for themselves?
see where that leaves you? you want to come up w/ your theories and try generalize or make some ****** pattern to them yet you end up making a fool of yourself. LOL.
If you HONESTLY believe roach wasn't speaking for manny then IMO you are either When roach gave this interview he was speaking for Manny. Of course there are times when he is not. Of course he can give interviews. There is no theory I am touting.
What I am saying is simple, Manny refused to fight Shane. Your counter to that is Manny didn't refuse, Roach and Bob did. My counter to that is if you think roach wasn't speaking for manny DURING THIS INTERVIEW, then IMO you are either playing games or are ****ing ****** because Roach knew he was on the record being videotaped. Your last response contains theoretical truths but does not address THIS SPECIFIC SITUATION.
Give it up dude. Your boy refused to fight Shane. Roach, Bob, Jinkee, Pistol Whip, Cungle, and Manny himself all admit this. Why can't you.Comment
-
how dumb can you be, really. no one's denying roach's interview not wanting the mosley fight. and obviously manny would have to give up one, in order to accept another, that's just how it is simple as that, so what's the big deal?
my first post in this thread was simple, to lay out the time line for the other poster. but you have to butt in and insinuate manny somehow ducked mosley or something. if he chose mosley, you would be here insinuating he ducked cotto. w/ the ******ed reasoning you're using, i'm pretty sure you think also manny's reason in refusing to fight mosley were the same as roach's
Comment
Comment