-
-
So was it hardened or not? Yes or no?1. So it was the ingredients..but not plaster of Paris..So these ingrdients are also found in what? Yea its ok to say.....Lotion..Which one was it? We dont knwo for sure.
Name 1 lotion in the world that harden's. Be serious.
2. Great we have one wrap why wasnt it hardened then? I mean if it was wet I imagine the hardening process would begin until hardened. Especially by the time court came around right? I mean they said it was hardening right?
Please stop with the ignorance. I already gave you a perfect example with Richard Colvin Reid <~~ Remember
4.Your saying if he gave us footage of training camp maybe we can find out..So you have no footage but your ***uming..We have pics dont we from after the Cotto fight? Im sure Margo was cheating and dumb enough to say take of my gloves so we can let the cast breathe.
We are talking about the Mosley fight where he got caught. Cotto fight wraps were never examined to my knowledge, the Mosley wrpas were and they came back illegal.
Do you really think that if it was those ingredients were more attributed to lotion than Plaster of Paris that Margarito would have got suspended?
Even Margs said the warps were illegal.. Talk what is so illegal about lotion.
With the technology we have today I am pretty sure the lamb could have figure out if the Sulfur + Calcium came from lotion or Plaster.. Which they did and decide it most likely came from plaster.
Colvin reid and Margorito are far from doing the saem thing so throw that out...Really dude had traces of ingredients of C4 and Margo of plaster of Paris and Betty Crocker of cake..GTFO with that. Cmoapring apples to oranges.
Horus all you do is answer questions with side step questions. You could not answer any of my intial questions. Which were simple. All im doing is going in circles with you. Everytime you answer you ask the same question in different wording like a cop. I have no energy to argue with brick wall. Other people see it but you, maybe you should get two eyes in your avatar.Comment
-
The main focus of his article was diminish to me because of this.
They diminish the core of the evidence and then want the reader to
read with a open mind, knowing that what was on the wraps was not due to hand lotion as they try to slide through the readers eye. But really from plaster of paris.
I already gave a senerio about how I feel about this kind if argument.
Last edited by Horus; 08-11-2010, 02:25 PM.Comment
-
I attempted to answer all your questions.
Can u now attempt to answer mines.
Question for Textstro
calcium+sulfur+water+oxygen= plaster of paris
"traces" of Sulfur + Calcium, moist, hardening, and bloody = Margarito Wraps.
QUESTION THAT HAVE TO BE Answered
1.Why was these ingredients in his wraps if not for a purpose?
2. What was the purpose of having them in his gloves if it was not intend to be used a weapon?
3. What would have happen if the Margarito was allowed to get in the ring with those Sulfur + Calcium, moist, hardening, bloody wraps?Last edited by Horus; 08-11-2010, 02:55 PM.Comment
-
No they didn't Horus
Hauser went through it explained what they found and Tony's lawyer questions whether these materials could be found elsewhere
the reason it wasn't expounded upon further is because it wasn't the focus of the article. Even at that point everything leading up to that point was a step by step outline of what happened leading up to it
the only subjective part is whether Capetillo and Tony knew
and yet you get subjective about the objective part of this piece?
really?
and how can anyone have an open mind reading your stuff when you yourself solely focused on one aspect in a closed minded fashion?
you're debating the obvious with three people who want nothing more than to get to you
so much so you created a whole new thread about it
they win lolComment
-
Eaner,
You can read through this thread and other threads to figure out people are trying to diminish the core of the edvidence and the people invovled like it is some sort of conspiracy. That the "They" I am talking about.
As far as me making a thread about it, I made this thread because the argument in my opinion needed to be addressed before it got out of hand.
I tend to nip **** in the bud quick if given the chance. So considered this issued being niped.
Comment
-
its the same three people repeatedly
that warrants threads?
I'm out
you do not want to debate you want to cherry pick
peaceComment
Tweet
Comment