If Mayweather was Kotelnik and Pacquiao was Alexander

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Crazylegs77
    null and void
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Jan 2008
    • 13101
    • 445
    • 296
    • 21,573

    #11
    Hmm Im intrigued.

    This is my kind of thread, my compliments to the thread starter.

    Comment

    • Pacquiao'd
      Banned
      • Mar 2010
      • 11948
      • 612
      • 153
      • 12,591

      #12
      kotelnik won simple as that. it was just as clear as Sergio wining his fight fight with PWILL. it was pretty close but clear.

      Comment

      • bojangles1987
        bo jungle
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Jul 2009
        • 41118
        • 1,326
        • 357
        • 63,028

        #13
        Definitely Mayweather. You cannot score a fight for a fighter that misses that much and gets hit by all the hard shots.

        Comment

        • Deep Blue 1997
          On to the Next One
          Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
          • Sep 2009
          • 846
          • 74
          • 126
          • 6,990

          #14
          Originally posted by Ray*
          Who would you have scored the fight to if the fight had gone the exact way like it did last night in the Alexander-Kotelnik fight? No childish rant just a little twist in opinion.. Poll coming up
          after what i saw from what the judges like: Mayweather will always lose to Manny.

          all Manny has to do is move his hands.

          Comment

          • bojangles1987
            bo jungle
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Jul 2009
            • 41118
            • 1,326
            • 357
            • 63,028

            #15
            Originally posted by GdoubleOD
            after what i saw from what the judges like: Mayweather will always lose to Manny.

            all Manny has to do is move his hands.
            Not really. Alexander didn't win because he moved his hands, he won because he is the star and there was no way he could lose that fight in his hometown with a Bradley fight looming.

            With Floyd and Pac the star thing isn't a factor.

            Comment

            • Deep Blue 1997
              On to the Next One
              Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
              • Sep 2009
              • 846
              • 74
              • 126
              • 6,990

              #16
              Originally posted by bojangles1987
              Not really. Alexander didn't win because he moved his hands, he won because he is the star and there was no way he could lose that fight in his hometown with a Bradley fight looming.

              With Floyd and Pac the star thing isn't a factor.
              i hope you're right man... but this still leads to politics in boxing.

              so you never know if we get a robbery in that fight also

              Comment

              • Little Mac
                Amateur
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • May 2009
                • 54637
                • 566
                • 1,247
                • 61,524

                #17
                Originally posted by SkillspayBills
                You have Diehard fans of Alexander saying he lost. That tells you all you need t know. Oddly enough if that were the case I wouldn't accept the points from bets that I have won. I refuse to win a bet on a robbery. I have e-inegrity.
                I didn't accept money or e-points on the first Malignaggi-Diaz fight either. It felt too wrong, but if this happened with Mayweather-Pacquiao...I wouldn't be surprised if they milk a trilogy. I'd actually LOL if Pac decided to "not think about boxing" if he beat Mayweather.

                Comment

                Working...
                TOP