Lederman: "You win fights by ring generalship so I have Alexander winning clearly"

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • HaglerSteelChin
    Self-Exiled
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Nov 2009
    • 1737
    • 96
    • 98
    • 8,163

    #11
    Lederman had a horrible score card, 8-1 after 9 rds. I think he gave two of the last 3 to Kotelnik to make it closer, as he heard Kellerman thinking the fight was much closer to that. Lederman has a history of odd ball scoring. He had John John Molina beating De La Hoya in a fight that DLH clearly won. He had Pac beating JMM by 3 points in the rematch, even many pac fans had it closer than that.

    The only major fight i had the same score as Lederman was DLH VS Trinidad, i had it 114-114 as he did a draw.

    Comment

    • Pugilistic™
      MV3
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Nov 2006
      • 9848
      • 324
      • 305
      • 16,773

      #12
      Lederman's scoring can be dreadful sometimes. Last night was another one to add to his poor scoring list.

      Comment

      • GoogleMe
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Sep 2009
        • 3459
        • 108
        • 145
        • 12,675

        #13
        Should've been closer.

        Comment

        • colly10
          Contender
          Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
          • Jun 2009
          • 158
          • 1
          • 46
          • 6,247

          #14
          Lederman was way off, there was clear bias there, I felt that kotelnik edged the fight by landing the cleaner more effective shots and landing more of them
          Lederman seems to think that landing loads of shots on the gloves is enough to win the fight, Alexander landed few clean effective shots.

          Neither fighter had power but kotelnik's looked more effective

          Comment

          • southcentralcar
            Undisputed Champion
            • Mar 2009
            • 2452
            • 152
            • 134
            • 8,735

            #15
            Originally posted by Precision
            Lederman's scoring can be dreadful sometimes. Last night was another one to add to his poor scoring list.
            its dreadful when you disagree with it, right ? DDD you guys are hilarious
            if youre so good at scoring fights how come youre a plumber and not a boxing judge. now how would you react if some boxing judge would come to you and start saying that youre horrible at plumbing ?

            Comment

            • mathed
              molṑn labé
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Feb 2009
              • 54549
              • 2,741
              • 2,984
              • 224,675

              #16
              Originally posted by Crazylegs77
              What was odd was my scorecard was close on the Johnson Cloud fight but Lederman lost me on the Alexander match totally. Guess Harold is a big Alexander fan.
              Exactly, I made this exact statement last night...completely different way o scoring. Johnson was forced to cover up while Cloud unleashed 6 hit combinations which were all blocked and Lederman scored it as those punches didn't land so, they are pointless. Our scores were really close in the first fight, in the second fight though.....lol, I'm not sure what fight he was watching

              Comment

              • mathed
                molṑn labé
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Feb 2009
                • 54549
                • 2,741
                • 2,984
                • 224,675

                #17
                Originally posted by southcentralcar
                its dreadful when you disagree with it, right ? DDD you guys are hilarious
                if youre so good at scoring fights how come youre a plumber and not a boxing judge. now how would you react if some boxing judge would come to you and start saying that youre horrible at plumbing ?
                You didn't think it was odd that ALL the judges had the exact same scores in both fights. Not saying the scores themselves were the sme but that all 3 of the judges had unanimous scores in each fight, respectively. 116-112, all the judges with that same score in the second fight.....judging is personally objective, that's why there is so much deviation in scoring normally.....there was no deviation at all..someone got an extra check somewhere.

                Comment

                • RimmyDelicious
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Jun 2008
                  • 1912
                  • 170
                  • 413
                  • 8,338

                  #18
                  Lederman had Williams over Quintana in the first fight by quite a few points as well. Lederman loves his high volume american fighters.

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  TOP