Should Asterix Be Put Next To Victories Won By Catch Weight?

**NesNY** · 08-07-2010, 12:35 PM

no. DLH fought at catchweight. Hopkins won.
SRL fought at catchweight and beat Lalonde.
Floyd fought at Catchweight and beat Marquez.

and countless others, including HoF'ers fought at catchweight. so put an asterisk * (not asterix) over wins but not on losses? Sweet, Hopkins never beat DLH then.

it's part of boxing. move the f**k on. we get it, Pac's fight shouldn't be for a title......now how does this affect your daily life again?

**Franco2012** · 08-07-2010, 12:36 PM

FLOYD MARQUEZ is gonna need two ASTERIX,one for catchweight fight and one more cuz Floyd failed to make weight for which he signed for!

**mushahadeen** · 08-07-2010, 12:39 PM

Originally posted by Mannie Phresh

Should *Asterix* Be Put Next To Victories Won By Catch Weight?

Yes. Bernard Hopkins should have a * for beating De La Hoya. What a great point.

**Canelo Phresh** · 08-07-2010, 12:43 PM

Originally posted by NesNY

no. DLH fought at catchweight. Hopkins won.
SRL fought at catchweight and beat Lalonde.
Floyd fought at Catchweight and beat Marquez.

and countless others, including HoF'ers fought at catchweight. so put an asterisk * (not asterix) over wins but not on losses? Sweet, Hopkins never beat DLH then.

it's part of boxing. move the f**k on. we get it, Pac's fight shouldn't be for a title......now how does this affect your daily life again?

didnt mention pac **** licker. stop thinking about him for 1 ****ing second you pathetic piece of ****. didnt mention your god ******. shut the **** up you ****ing duche bag, your a fu.cking tool.

**Franco2012** · 08-07-2010, 12:43 PM

Originally posted by mushahadeen

Yes. Bernard Hopkins should have a * for beating De La Hoya. What a great point.

hahahahahahaha

**NesNY** · 08-07-2010, 12:46 PM

Originally posted by Mannie Phresh

didnt mention pac **** licker. stop thinking about him for 1 ****ing second you pathetic piece of ****. didnt mention your god ******. shut the **** up you ****ing duche bag, your a fu.cking tool.

sorry, you're (not "your") probably 16 and extremely emotional (and apparently suck at spelling).

Oh I see what happened. You're just asterisk-crazy. I take it back, put an asterisk on EVERYTHING!!!

**Canelo Phresh** · 08-07-2010, 12:49 PM

Originally posted by NesNY

sorry, you're (not "your") probably 16 and extremely emotional (and apparently suck at spelling).

Oh I see what happened. You're just asterisk-crazy. I take it back, put an asterisk on EVERYTHING!!!

dumb****s like you have to make everything about mayweather vs pacquiao. the fights off move on if you dont want to discuss the subject **** or just make another ******* ***** bate thread.

**AKATheMack** · 08-07-2010, 12:51 PM

Yea because the fact they put the weight the fight was fought at and what the fighters each weighed fore the fight isnt enough. Lets add an *, ?, !, #,% and & beside them.

**NesNY** · 08-07-2010, 12:51 PM

homie, I don't care about either of em. They're entertainers to me, nothing else.
I don't box amateur or pro, I don't pretend to know more than I know. I don't pretend to follow their every move.

I call it like I see it. I'm almost 30 and been watching boxing since the late 80s. lol. calm down. It's THE INTERNET!!!!

p.s.

I haven't created a single thread on NSB....because I simply don't give a ****. lol.

Should Asterix Be Put Next To Victories Won By Catch Weight?