Bradley's resume is smoke and mirrors!

[MACAQUEINBLACK]

Funny how I don't even like most British fighters.

No, you just like the big-name ones. The ones that can put the UK on the map in sports and that...the BBCSPOTY's, LMAO.



I'll reply to a few points, FWIW,

Nate Campbell was legitimately moving up because he couldn't make 135 anymore, Bradley needed an opponent, Campbell was there. Marquez is not legitimately moving up. Schaefer's been plotting this for a year for Khan.

Holt, at that point in his career, is a better win than Paulie at that point in his career. Absolutely. And I'm a HUGE Paulie fan. But a sane one, who doesn't think that beating a small, war-torn Juan Diaz at almost 140lbs means anything. Paulie was not in the middle of some great renaissance, as Khan boosters like to claim. He was just fighting to his strengths again, which he didn't do under McGirt. But he had been, and still was, on the slide overall - lost timing, lost speed, unable to let hands go. And I've followed Paul for years, so I have an idea of what my guy looks like at his best.

Hypothetically, if Khan could beat the Holt that Bradley beat, he'd be deserving of a big slice more credit.

That said, beating that Paulie is perfectly fine. It's what he's doing next. He's not stepping up. Take away the paper and he's a contender who isn't seasoning himself against other dangerous contenders.

Bradley and Alexander have both unified. Stepped to the other titlists they could get a hold of. Holt was dangerous one, as was Urango...those guys represent a measure of danger that is absent in Khan's work for a reason...and which will remain absent for the near future because he's fighting Marquez and not a 140lb dangerman.




I don't hate Khan because he was "knocked out". I don't even hate Khan period. I like him, he's a nice guy. And I won't gloat if he loses, save for an "I told you so" for his bumsniffing cheerleaders. And it won't be because I think Khan's ****, because I don't - it'll be because you were all party to a Gay stage-management process which failed to give Khan adequate prep for the test in which he falls flat on his arse.


I don't see you defending any needlessly criticized boxers...I see you defending only the big name British fighters...Khan, Calzaghe in his post-Lacy day.

SaWhy all the hate for Bradley?

It's about Khan.




/NINJA

[mathed]

No, you just like the big-name ones. The ones that can put the UK on the map in sports and that...the BBCSPOTY's, LMAO.



I'll reply to a few points, FWIW,

Nate Campbell was legitimately moving up because he couldn't make 140, Bradley needed an opponent, Campbell was there. Marquez is not legitimately moving up. Schaefer's been plotting this for a year for Khan.

Holt, at that point in his career, is a better win than Paulie at that point in his career. Absolutely. And I'm a HUGE Paulie fan. But a sane one, who doesn't think that beating a small, war-torn Juan Diaz at almost 140lbs means anything. Paulie was not in the middle of some great renaissance, as Khan boosters like to claim. He was just fighting to his strengths again, which he didn't do under McGirt. But he had been, and still was, on the slide overall - lost timing, lost speed, unable to let hands go. And I've followed Paul for years, so I have an idea of what my guy looks like at his best.

Hypothetically, if Khan could beat the Holt that Bradley beat, he'd be deserving of a big slice more credit.

That said, beating that Paulie is perfectly fine. It's what he's doing next. He's not stepping up. Take away the paper and he's a contender who isn't seasoning himself against other dangerous contenders.

Bradley and Alexander have both unified. Stepped to the other titlists they could get a hold of. Holt was dangerous one, as was Urango...those guys represent a measure of danger that is absent in Khan's work for a reason...and which will remain absent for the near future because he's fighting Marquez and not a 140lb dangerman.




I don't hate Khan because he was "knocked out". I don't even hate Khan period. I like him, he's a nice guy. And I won't gloat if he loses, save for an "I told you so" for his bumsniffing cheerleaders. And it won't be because I think Khan's ****, because I don't - it'll be because you were all party to a Gay stage-management process which failed to give Khan adequate prep for the test in which he falls flat on his arse.


I don't see you defending any needlessly criticized boxers...I see you defending only the big name British fighters...Khan, Calzaghe in his post-Lacy day.











It's about Khan.




/NINJA

It must be, Khan turns things to gold remember....he is the Golden One

[Evil Abed]

People here will never be satisfied.

They will still b$tch when Bradley beats Alexander, Maidana and Khan.

Bradley will be the next unified champ.

[MARKBNLV]

People here will never be satisfied.

They will still b$tch when Bradley beats Alexander, Maidana and Khan.

Bradley will be the next unified champ.

I agree most here expect an undefeated record with 100 percent kos.

[MACAQUEINBLACK]

I mean,


LMAO @ anyone who'd say a fading Magic Man (who struggled to T/KO anyone even at his best) represents a more dangerous challenge than the Kendall Holt Bradley largely dominated and bullied. Holt is an underachiever, he lacks some intangibles, but he's a very good and dangerous fighter when dedicated -- he's fast in hand, foot, upper body, can punch hard, good physical attributes -- and he was dedicated at the time Bradley fought him.

People diss because Torres gave him a hard time (somewhat premature stoppage in shady circumstances down in South America), but that's the same Torres who almost stopped Miguel Cotto on Cotto-friendly turf at Boardwalk Hall.


You best believe that version of Holt would be a better scalp than the version of Malignaggi Khan fought.

[Frank Ducketts]

Khan, Bradley, and Alexander are young fighters who shouldn't be critically criticized yet. Khan is rightfully criticized now for being ko'd as we don't know how his career will turn out. Khan, Maidana, Bradley and Alexander will write their own history in the next few years. Damn I wish Valero turned out to be a good apple

[MACAQUEINBLACK]

Damn I wish Valero turned out to be a good apple

Me and you both, man.




I miss that guy being in boxing.

[JuanDan]

khan would give alexander and bradley a boxing lesson.

A mere Khon has not even been tested yet, Your talking about a fighter who won’t fight anyone he considers dangerous
Strip away all the spin and hype and all you have is an unproven contender

[S.G.]

Bradley did not actually beat Nate Campbell ftr

[badnewsbrown]

Junior Witter - Decent win.

Edner Cherry - LOL - Lost to Mallignaggi.

Kendall Holt - Lost to some bum the other month. Not a top fighter.

Nate Campbell - Old, shot, blown up lightweight.

Lamont Peterson - Never fought a name. Green. No real pedigree.

Abregu - Never fought a name. Poor boxing skills.

Everybody salute the king of the JWW division!!!

Witter is his best win, although he was also clearly no longer at his best.