Was the fight Boreing?

[DLT]

I didnt see it but it kind of sounds that way but Im not for sure because no one has said it and you usally hear that.

Was it boreing or exciting or was it a pretty boreing fight but because it was so close and had a littile drama made it exciting in the end?

[Bad Intentions]

every Hopkins fight is boring...but Taylor made it interesting at times unlike DLH, Eastman ect...

[Seven]

I didn't think the fight was boring. I thought it was an awesome fight, but once again it was the very first PPV that I ordered because I'm only 17 and I don't normally get to order things on PPV. B-Hop fights with that laid back style in the first rounds and then really lays into his opponents in the later rounds. Yes, I admit it cost him a Unanamous decision this time, and it even cost him the match. I like B-Hop's style of boxing and I really enjoyed the fight. I'm also suprised that Jermain didn't use the jab as much or as effective as he should have.

[AP6]

nope, it wasn't boring at all.not that much action early on but it kept me interested. better than DLH/HOPKINS IMO

[Tony Blitz]

It was boring in a way of no slugfest/brawling, but the tactical fighting was entertaining to watch

[Seven]

I'd rather watch a more tactical fight then a slugfest. I've watched plenty of slugfests in my life and those fights were ridiculous. Barley any punches landed and a lot of them were from luck. Tactical fights are way more entertaining because both fighters are landing smart punches that are more effective in the long run.

[Tony Blitz]

Heh, my idea of "slugfest" isn't a bunch of arms weiling around, rather a fight like Mayweather vs. Gatti, Trinidad vs. Mayorga, Castillo vs. Corrales, you get the idea, just a lot of nice powerful shots.

[Seven]

Some fights that have a lot of nice powerful shots aren't slugfests, though. The fighters take the time to feel their opponent out and land the big shots when they see the opening, making them more of a tactical fight. But, yes I see where you are coming from.