Floyd has losses too you know.

[S H O B O X]

the reason why pacquiao is a 7 division champ is because he started boxing with the age of 16.
if u wanna still call him a 7division champ, u shouldnt moan about his 2 losses.

nah man , i'm not moaning , i just don't see how his early losses to bums are relevant now given his present acheivements , same with floyd's amateur losses the ts is pointing out , i just posted in this thread when it became "who's losses are worse , manny or floyd's" when really they don't mean anthing except one guy's pro record is unblemished

and i don't know many guys who became 7 division champs because they started at 16 lol

[Mr Punch.]

41-0-0

Another loss right here

http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/showthread.php?t=411967

[sicko]

this **** is HILARIOUS

are some of you really that desperate to find anything negative on Mayweather that you have to go way back to Amateurs and talk about him losing as a Amateur? WOW!

this right here is just DESPERATION and Elie cracks me up on how he is trying to hype this guy, a guy that hasn't done much as a Pro, wasn't he just KO'd in the 1st round by Jorge Arce so yeah I am sure he can beat Mayweather again...hahaha

[Schmerzen]

nah man , i'm not moaning , i just don't see how his early losses to bums are relevant now given his present acheivements , same with floyd's amateur losses the ts is pointing out , i just posted in this thread when it became "who's losses are worse , manny or floyd's" when really they don't mean anthing except one guy's pro record is unblemished

and i don't know many guys who became 7 division champs because they started at 16 lol

think first, then talk.
pac was already a 2 division champ when he faced singsurat.
he was 21, lost a fight against a bum by a KO as the flyweight champ, so why is his loss not relevant?
and pacquiao fans should learn how to handle the truth instead of making 1.000.000 excuses.
i already see it coming, 5 years after floyd demolishes pac, his fans will claim he wasnt the same fighter anymore, and the loss isnt important because he retired 2 fights later .
i think pacquiao fans listen too much to roach, still remember him saying pacquiao is gonna easily beat marquez, he is better today than he was 4 years ago blabla.
of course we know the reality looked a little different.
41-0-0, floyd has no losses, dont compare floyd to pac until some1 beats him.

[Joeyzagz]

Another new boxing fan who doesnt realize everyone has lost in the amateurs. Doesnt realize amateur and professional are two different, distinct things. I used to like new fans to the sport, not so much anymore.

Funny how you have Andre Ward in your avatar and made that comment....

[Megamasterking]

Mayweather is not undefeated

Floyd Mayweather lost the first Pro fight against Castillo in Las Vegas, Castillo was robbed and everybody knows it except some Floyd fans who never went in a ring with boxing gloves on.

[Heeb]

Amateur and professional boxing are pretty different sports. A lot of outstanding amateurs don't have great pro careers and a decent amount of pros had poor amateur careers. Amateur losses don't mean much in the pros. Only case I can think of where the amateurs could come into play in the pros is the mental advantage a fighter may have if they had beaten their opponent before in the amateurs.

[B.U.R.N.E.R]

Last I checked Floytd unlike Manny Pacquio has never been beaten let alone KO'd.

[Phenom]

Floyd Mayweather lost the first Pro fight against Castillo in Las Vegas, Castillo was robbed and everybody knows it except some Floyd fans who never went in a ring with boxing gloves on.

and the three judges who scored the fight two of which had Floyd winning 8 rounds to 4

[southcentralcar]

What has Pacman got to do with anything? I'm talking about Martin Castillo beating Mayweather twice.

hahahahahaha now thats desperate damn Maywetaher really is that good