JMM v. FMJr. @ 130-140lbs. Would it have made any difference?

**STILL_DETOX** · 08-02-2010, 06:26 PM

in the past yes it would be more competitive.

**Dirk Diggler UK** · 08-02-2010, 06:31 PM

It obviously would've been more competitive at 130-135

**Pugilistic�** · 08-02-2010, 06:33 PM

Mayweather would of beat Marquez regardless of the size difference and i'm a big Marquez fan.

It would of probably been a tad more competitive in the lower weight classes but not by much.

**bojangles1987** · 08-02-2010, 06:37 PM

At 130 it is a close, 8-4 or 7-5 type Floyd win.

At 135 it is lopsided.

At 140 it looks the same as it did at 147.

**ForemanGrill** · 08-02-2010, 06:40 PM

Mayweather is Marquez with more speed and skill. Having them fight at a lower weight would have made it a closer fight, but the end result would have been the same. I'm saying that as a big fan of Marquez.

**Heru** · 08-02-2010, 06:41 PM

At 130, it would've been more competitive. JMM would've won 3-4 rounds instead of 0 or a pity round.

Marquez weighed in comfortably looking hydrated at 133.5. That just tells you that Mayweather had a 13 pound advantage on him.

**Franco2012** · 08-02-2010, 06:43 PM

of course it would

Floyd was 161 against Marquez and Marquez is natural featherweight

**lefthook2daliva** · 08-02-2010, 06:43 PM

Originally posted by mikelovesfood

How do you think it would've turned out? The same I think. At least not as lopsided as it was @ 144

Couple or 3 years or so ago @ 135 Floyd still would have been the favorite goin' in, but JMM would have been a very live underdog.

**infamous larryx** · 08-02-2010, 06:46 PM

no differance..floyd doesnt use size to win..he uses skill

JMM v. FMJr. @ 130-140lbs. Would it have made any difference?