Would people's perception of Paul Williams be different if he was Mexican or PR
Collapse
-
-
Wow you are a dying breed so I'll respect a ODLH nut hugger.
Please tell me his biggest wins?
6 Divisions? How many paper titles did he win?
Do divisions even really count anymore? Look at Pacquiao
Morales becoming the greatest super bantam of all time, Beating better opponents than De La Hoya who were rated P4P most of his career.
Barrera, Just look at his resume! He had one of the greatest runs in featherweight of all time.
De La Hoya got gift decision with Sturm, Ran like a ***** against Tito, Got toyed with by a freaking midget, Beat past prime chavez and whitaker, Lost every major fight he was in... on and on and on.
He's not even top 50 ATG while everyone else is, Disagree? Well everyone else here agrees.
Chavez > Chava > Finito > Zarate > Olivares > Morales=Barrera> JMM etc etc
De La Hoya ni les llega a los talones compa!Comment
-
His fight with Junior Jones speaks for itself. De La Hoya has never beaten a fighter as good as Barrera or Pacquiao that were in their primes like those guys were. So you can't sit there and tell me his resume is better than the resume Morales has. That's just crazy talk. Plus De La Hoya lost to guys moving up in weight which counts against his legacy. At least Hopkins beat the smaller guys he fought.Comment
-
Comment
-
He brought that up because I mentioned of how De La Hoya started out at 130 beating up guys like a tiny ass Jorge Paez. And his counter argument is fair on that I guess. But Morales didn't have weight advantages over Junior Jones or Barrera and he beat them. De La Hoya had weight advantages over Mosley, Mayweather, Chavez, Whitaker, and Mayweather. And he only managed to beat one of those guys decisively. Lol.Comment
-
And it was old ass ChavezHe brought that up because I mentioned of how De La Hoya started out at 130 beating up guys like a tiny ass Jorge Paez. And his counter argument is fair on that I guess. But Morales didn't have weight advantages over Junior Jones or Barrera and he beat them. De La Hoya had weight advantages over Mosley, Mayweather, Chavez, Whitaker, and Mayweather. And he only managed to beat one of those guys decisively. Lol.
Comment
-
Of course, lots of fans are so into who's the one that is winning mentality.Wow you are a dying breed so I'll respect a ODLH nut hugger.
Ummm let's see......Hernandez, Molina, Ruelas, Maro mero Paez, Chavez, Gonzalez, Whitaker, Quartey, Camacho, Gatti, Vargas, Mayorga. Basically every DLH fight was a big one.Please tell me his biggest wins?
So the guys you mentioned didn't win any vacant titles?6 Divisions? How many paper titles did he win?
Exactly!! Look at Pac, how many people have won just as many titles as him??Do divisions even really count anymore? Look at Pacquiao
Like who??Morales becoming the greatest super bantam of all time, Beating better opponents than De La Hoya who were rated P4P most of his career.
I'm sorry but DLh never lost to the Junior Jones, Khans of the world.Barrera, Just look at his resume! He had one of the greatest runs in featherweight of all time.
He did. But he got robbed with Tito and Mosley. Beat a past prime Chavez and Whitaker?? Weren't they in the P4P ratings?? So if Pac fights like **** vs Margarito and loses the next fight, should the winner get credit??De La Hoya got gift decision with Sturm, Ran like a ***** against Tito, Got toyed with by a freaking midget, Beat past prime chavez and whitaker, Lost every major fight he was in... on and on and on.
Because it's mostly people not liking Oscar. Duh!He's not even top 50 ATG while everyone else is, Disagree? Well everyone else here agrees.
Chavez > Chava > Finito > Zarate > Olivares > Morales=Barrera> JMM etc etc
De La Hoya ni les llega a los talones compa!
I'm sorry but none of those guys are better than DLH. Maybe a prime Chavez but that's about it. And I love Finito, one of my all time favs as well.Comment
-
Tiny ass Paez, but yet your ass is all up on Williams' nuts. Doesn't Williams fight smalller guys at 147?? Double standards??He brought that up because I mentioned of how De La Hoya started out at 130 beating up guys like a tiny ass Jorge Paez. And his counter argument is fair on that I guess. But Morales didn't have weight advantages over Junior Jones or Barrera and he beat them. De La Hoya had weight advantages over Mosley, Mayweather, Chavez, Whitaker, and Mayweather. And he only managed to beat one of those guys decisively. Lol.
Weight advantages over Whitaker?? He was moving up to face Whitaker.
You expect someone to be winning decisively when faced against opponents like that?? Tell me who could of done it?? Enlighten me please.Comment
-
You rank De La Hoya over Salvador fuckin Sanchez? You need to log off this site and kill yourself Chicano.Of course, lots of fans are so into who's the one that is winning mentality.
Ummm let's see......Hernandez, Molina, Ruelas, Maro mero Paez, Chavez, Gonzalez, Whitaker, Quartey, Camacho, Gatti, Vargas, Mayorga. Basically every DLH fight was a big one.
So the guys you mentioned didn't win any vacant titles?
Exactly!! Look at Pac, how many people have won just as many titles as him??
Like who??
I'm sorry but DLh never lost to the Junior Jones, Khans of the world.
He did. But he got robbed with Tito and Mosley. Beat a past prime Chavez and Whitaker?? Weren't they in the P4P ratings?? So if Pac fights like **** vs Margarito and loses the next fight, should the winner get credit??
Because it's mostly people not liking Oscar. Duh!
I'm sorry but none of those guys are better than DLH. Maybe a prime Chavez but that's about it. And I love Finito, one of my all time favs as well.
Comment
-
Comment
Comment