Dan Rafael: "Out of Mayweather, Haye and Povetkin...Floyd is CHICKEN OF THE YEAR"
Collapse
-
Dude, did you know you are insulting EM by using his name and having his pic as avatar and you are mouthing off floyd's ****?
Morales is ****in warrior and you idolises a ****in fraud chicken that everyone here sees you're cummin everytime you mention floyd's name.
Take off that name and change it to "fraud chicken" and put floyd's nut as your avatar!Comment
-
Very unprofessional from a sport writer, Who should always remain neutral on his articles and interviews. As a professional, He should never allow his personal OPPINIONS to interfere with his articles to avoid been labeled, bias.
I'm not impressed by Dan "Sally-Jessie" Rafael remarks, more disappointed than anything.Comment
-
Mayweather, in reality is being a good business man...he gonna build that fight till its guaranteed to be a best-seller(not that its not gonna be already). Hes gunnin to get his more and more money for this thing, he did take on Mosley which up until the third round of the fight was seen as a damn good threat.
In my opinion it has to be Povetkin, only because hes 100% not taking on anyone worth mentioning for the rest of the year...Haye could get in the ring with Harrison which I wouldnt mind looking forward to, I dont feel Harrison will win but his name is worth mentioning.Comment
-
-
-
From Dan Rafael's chat today...
-------------
Rico (San Antonio): Dan, and the chicken of the year goes to Mayweather, Haye or Povetkin?
Dan Rafael (12:11 PM): Mayweather.
------------
Phil (Chicago): Dan, name me one big time fighter who has ducked more good opponents than Mayweather. Just one, Dan.
Dan Rafael (12:24 PM): There aren't any.
------------
Nizzi (Des Moines, IA): So Mayweather gets the winner of Marquez vs. Diaz?
Dan Rafael (12:33 PM): No, I think Calderon-Segura.
http://espn.go.com/sportsnation/chat...ith-dan-rafaelComment
-
-
I'd go as far as saying that Dan Raphael makes me sick. At the end of the day Floyd is master of his trade, Haye and Povetkin are skilled at what they do. Dan sucks at what he does, he cannot be objective with his opinion and he presents his articles in such a **** way.Comment
Comment