Pac - Catchweight King of the Decade

[S H A R K B O Y]

Either way he's still a catchweight king.

[Stone Roses!]

He was pointing out that Pac has 1 catchweight last decade and none so far this decade MORON.

Er No way

Pacquiao seals his Catchweight Greatness in this Decade with this fight.

It's going to be tough to beat him.

[fcastro1]

Emmanuel PacquiaO fans are beginning to realise Arum and Roach have been carefully matchmaking Pacquiao's path to "greatness".


Catchweight King is right.

you know thats absolute nonsense. pac fought sasakul as a 19 year old in his home town for the flyweight title. He took on ledwaba with 2 weeks notice on his first fight in america. His first fight at featherweight was against the best featherweight and p4p 3 barrera. He fought marquez when everyone was ducking him. He jumped 3 weights in a year to fight delahoya.

How can you honestly say he hasn't taken any risks. You are an absolute doughnut.

[Mr Punch.]

You are an idiot.


TS can claim Pacquiao's Catchweight Greatness in both decades.

"Pac - Catchweight King of the Decade" is how he titled the thread. You are a fcuking bellend of the highest order.

[Stone Roses!]

"Pac - Catchweight King of the Decade" is how he titled the thread. You are a fcuking bellend of the highest order.

You're a moron.

[Stone Roses!]

you know thats absolute nonsense. pac fought sasakul as a 19 year old in his home town for the flyweight title. He took on ledwaba with 2 weeks notice on his first fight in america. His first fight at featherweight was against the best featherweight and p4p 3 barrera. He fought marquez when everyone was ducking him. He jumped 3 weights in a year to fight delahoya.

How can you honestly say he hasn't taken any risks. You are an absolute doughnut.

1. Arum and Roach weren't with Pac when he was 19.
2. Marquez was robbed. Twice.
3. De la Hoya was shot, old and a walking dead man fighting at a weight he hadn't fought at in 7 years.

[Mr Punch.]

You're a moron.

You are the moron. You made a mistake, and are scrambling around to try to make it better. dummy

[Stone Roses!]

You are the moron. You made a mistake, and are scrambling around to try to make it better. dummy

No mistake made.


You are the dunce who misinterpreted it.

Moron.

[fcastro1]

1. Arum and Roach weren't with Pac when he was 19.
2. Marquez was robbed. Twice.
3. De la Hoya was shot, old and a walking dead man fighting at a weight he hadn't fought at in 7 years.

1. roach was with him when he took on barrera,leadwaba, marquez and delahoya.

2. What does marquez being robbed have to do with pac being matchmade. How can you honestly say pac was matchmade against marquez or barrera.

3.Delahoya wasn't shot in his last 2 fights before that and he was the one that wanted to fight at welaterweight. How did pac no he would mess up training. And how can you call that great matchmaking pac moving up three weights where 99% of the people thought he would lose.

[Stone Roses!]

1. roach was with him when he took on barrera,leadwaba, marquez and delahoya.

Never denied that you dunce. You brought up a 19 year old Pac so I corrected you.

2. What does marquez being robbed have to do with pac being matchmade against marquez. How can you honestly say pac was matchmade against marquez or barrera.

I give Pacquiao props for his 1st fight with Barrera but nothing after that.

Point is, Pac was matched against a counter pouncher who outboxed him. Pacquiao could not handle the step up in class and was gifted the draw and decision.

3.Delahoya wasn't shot in his last 2 fights before that and he was the one that wanted to fight at welaterweight. How did pac no he would mess up training. And how can you call that matchmaking pac moving up three weights where 99% of the people thought he would lose.

Only fanboys fell for that ****. De La Hoya was old, drained and shot.