Pacquiao Margarito for the vacant W.B.C. Jr.middleweight title?.

**purecyse** · 07-27-2010, 09:55 AM

Originally posted by Geze

This is not fair for all those contenders.

The integrity of W.B.C. and those involved is at stake and will be in question if they proceed and sanction this unjust and embarrassing title fight!

perhaps you are the one who made the mistake when you continued to have the belief that the WBC has integrity.

the amount of belts floating around means that some organization will involve themselves in the big money fights to receive the maximum sanctioning fees that pays its employees and have the prestige of having the best fighter, at the time, wearing their belt.

i'm sure the opinion is that pacquiao will be taking this one so arum's backroom politics probably convinced them to put their vacant belt on the line.

**Khalid X** · 07-27-2010, 10:00 AM

Originally posted by Geze

PACQUIAO VS. MARGARITO for the vacant W.B.C. jr. middleweight crown?.

Who’s behind all this?

Doesn’t anyone think we are being taken and our intelligence insulted by these people?

How could W.B.C. sanction a title fight between Pacquiao and Margarito?

Yes Margarito is their #1 contender but Pacquiao is not even rated anywhere let alone a jr.middleweight.(super welterweight)

Have they surrendered the title to Margarito without him fighting any of the #2 Saul Alvares of Mexico #3 Ryan Rhodes of G.B. and # 4 Joachim Alcine of Canada.

This is not fair for all those contenders.

The integrity of W.B.C. and those involved is at stake and will be in question if they proceed and sanction this unjust and embarrassing title fight!

Honestly I wish Manny would just come out and say he refuses to fight this bout against Margarito with the title on the line. Then let Angulo fight Rhodes for the belt and face the winner afterwords.

**IMDAZED** · 07-27-2010, 10:00 AM

Watch it...for free.

**Amazinger** · 07-27-2010, 10:12 AM

Originally posted by purecyse

perhaps you are the one who made the mistake when you continued to have the belief that the WBC has integrity.

the amount of belts floating around means that some organization will involve themselves in the big money fights to receive the maximum sanctioning fees that pays its employees and have the prestige of having the best fighter, at the time, wearing their belt.

i'm sure the opinion is that pacquiao will be taking this one so arum's backroom politics probably convinced them to put their vacant belt on the line.

I should have said what's left of it then.

I hope Pacquiao refuse this fight.or at least say this should be a non title fight.
He's got good adviser around him to realize to make it a title fight is wrong.

**Amazinger** · 07-27-2010, 10:17 AM

Originally posted by Mr. Copeland

Honestly I wish Manny would just come out and say he refuses to fight this bout against Margarito with the title on the line. Then let Angulo fight Rhodes for the belt and face the winner afterwords.

Or at least defend his W.B.O. welterweight belt.Even though Margarito is not rated.it still credible.

Otherwise this W.B.C. junior middleweight title fight is complete BOGUS.

**NesNY** · 07-27-2010, 10:21 AM

shouldn't be for a title.
If Pac wins there's no way he'll defend this belt.

**Zerwas1** · 07-27-2010, 10:24 AM

His record of titles in different weight classes wont be broken for 100years?
he wont refuse

**IMDAZED** · 07-27-2010, 10:24 AM

Originally posted by Geze

Or at least defend his W.B.O. welterweight belt.Even though Margarito is not rated.it still credible.

Otherwise this W.B.C. junior middleweight title fight is complete BOGUS.

Why would he do that? When he can get you to watch his second straight tuneup on PPV?

**Amazinger** · 07-27-2010, 10:38 AM

Originally posted by Shadow boxer 3

just dont order it. im not supporting this ****

Do you have an idea what is this about?. read it again and try to understand the context.

Pacquiao Margarito for the vacant W.B.C. Jr.middleweight title?.