Putting a negative spin to a big victory (Examples)

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • cupocity303
    Banned
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Dec 2005
    • 9604
    • 752
    • 750
    • 22,038

    #1

    Putting a negative spin to a big victory (Examples)

    We all know that it's popular to **** on the entire resume of fighters. Particularly with Floyd and Pacquiao. Here are the possible negatives if Pac were to fight and beat these guys:


    Pacquiao defeats P.Williams - "Williams just came off of a war against Martinez and he was obviously dehydrated at 147"

    Pacquiao defeats Martinez - "Martinez lost to Williams in a War and at age 35, he probably had trouble making 154 and thus not at his best"

    Pacquiao defeats Bradley - "Bradley is overrated and not established. He struggled and got knocked down against Kendall Holt (who?), and he beat two nobodies in Peterson & Abregu"

    Pacquiao defeats Devon Alexander - "Alexander was too green. He just won his titles and obviously needed more seasoning. Perhaps if he had fought and beaten Bradley & Khan first, I would've given Pac credit"

    Pacquiao KO's Khan - Freddie Roach was in Pac's corner tonight. And it's obvious that Khan isn't at his best without Freddie Roach by his side. Perhaps Roach should've been in both their corners, rotating each round, instructing Khan for a round and Pac the next. Pacquiao needs to rematch Khan with Roach strictly being in Amir's corner. Then if Pac wins, he gets credit.


    You can virtually do this with every opponent, everybody's got baggage on em'.
  • sweetpea87
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Apr 2009
    • 4329
    • 723
    • 1,606
    • 58,530

    #2
    Originally posted by cupocity303
    We all know that it's popular to **** on the entire resume of fighters. Particularly with Floyd and Pacquiao. Here are the possible negatives if Pac were to fight and beat these guys:


    Pacquiao defeats P.Williams - "Williams just came off of a war against Martinez and he was obviously dehydrated at 147"

    Pacquiao defeats Martinez - "Martinez lost to Williams in a War and at age 35, he probably had trouble making 154 and thus not at his best"

    Pacquiao defeats Bradley - "Bradley is overrated and not established. He struggled and got knocked down against Kendall Holt (who?), and he beat two nobodies in Peterson & Abregu"

    Pacquiao defeats Devon Alexander - "Alexander was too green. He just won his titles and obviously needed more seasoning. Perhaps if he had fought and beaten Bradley & Khan first, I would've given Pac credit"

    Pacquiao KO's Khan - Freddie Roach was in Pac's corner tonight. And it's obvious that Khan isn't at his best without Freddie Roach by his side. Perhaps Roach should've been in both their corners, rotating each round, instructing Khan for a round and Pac the next. Pacquiao needs to rematch Khan with Roach strictly being in Amir's corner. Then if Pac wins, he gets credit.


    You can virtually do this with every opponent, everybody's got baggage on em'.
    These kind of ****** lame ass excuses only happen on the internet in places like boxingscene.

    Comment

    • HandSpeed303
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Jul 2008
      • 4793
      • 125
      • 97
      • 22,213

      #3
      Originally posted by sweetpea87
      These kind of ****** lame ass excuses only happen on the internet in places like boxingscene.
      There is some truth to that statement...

      Comment

      • the dart
        Contender
        Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
        • Sep 2009
        • 291
        • 16
        • 10
        • 6,598

        #4
        This guy would prefer for may and pac to fight 5 times cause he thinks any other fight is a waste of time

        Comment

        • Real King Kong
          Undisputed Champion
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • May 2010
          • 12029
          • 460
          • 24
          • 105,905

          #5
          for one pac would never fight williams or martinez. pac fans are starting to remind me of floyd fans...sayin **** like why should pac fight bradley or berto?...he'd beat them easy. then being happy with him fighting lesser competition.

          Comment

          • HandSpeed303
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Jul 2008
            • 4793
            • 125
            • 97
            • 22,213

            #6
            Originally posted by considerthis
            for one pac would never fight williams or martinez. pac fans are starting to remind me of floyd fans...sayin **** like why should pac fight bradley or berto?...he'd beat them easy. then being happy with him fighting lesser competition.
            I don't think that was the point he was trying to make.

            Comment

            • Alex_Hayden
              Interim Champion
              Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
              • May 2010
              • 663
              • 28
              • 5
              • 6,787

              #7
              Originally posted by cupocity303
              We all know that it's popular to **** on the entire resume of fighters. Particularly with Floyd and Pacquiao. Here are the possible negatives if Pac were to fight and beat these guys:


              Pacquiao defeats P.Williams - "Williams just came off of a war against Martinez and he was obviously dehydrated at 147"

              Pacquiao defeats Martinez - "Martinez lost to Williams in a War and at age 35, he probably had trouble making 154 and thus not at his best"

              Pacquiao defeats Bradley - "Bradley is overrated and not established. He struggled and got knocked down against Kendall Holt (who?), and he beat two nobodies in Peterson & Abregu"

              Pacquiao defeats Devon Alexander - "Alexander was too green. He just won his titles and obviously needed more seasoning. Perhaps if he had fought and beaten Bradley & Khan first, I would've given Pac credit"

              Pacquiao KO's Khan - Freddie Roach was in Pac's corner tonight. And it's obvious that Khan isn't at his best without Freddie Roach by his side. Perhaps Roach should've been in both their corners, rotating each round, instructing Khan for a round and Pac the next. Pacquiao needs to rematch Khan with Roach strictly being in Amir's corner. Then if Pac wins, he gets credit.


              You can virtually do this with every opponent, everybody's got baggage on em'.
              lol Over exaggerating much?

              If you can't tell when a fighter isn't at his best or is being exploited for their new found weaknesses that's no ones fault but your own.

              And those fighters are too good compared to Paq's standard opponent. He doesn't want it with those kinds of fighters. At least not without the standard catch weight/prior beat downs etc etc. But with the exception of Khan and Bradley, I think Paq would actually be in deep water with the rest.

              Comment

              • antrob
                Undisputed Champion
                • Jun 2009
                • 1236
                • 53
                • 88
                • 7,403

                #8
                So i guess Pac shouldn't fight none of those guys then. What's the point?

                Comment

                • 120
                  Lords of BoxingScene
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • May 2008
                  • 6264
                  • 416
                  • 799
                  • 13,757

                  #9
                  that would be the point of view of very few and nothing that would be taken into account looking back at their careers

                  Comment

                  • cupocity303
                    Banned
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Dec 2005
                    • 9604
                    • 752
                    • 750
                    • 22,038

                    #10
                    Originally posted by HandSpeed303
                    I don't think that was the point he was trying to make.
                    One has to have at least an average IQ of 100 to qualify comprehending this thread.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP