are # of title defenses overrated

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • -MAKAVELLI-
    Banned
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Aug 2008
    • 50080
    • 3,580
    • 2,792
    • 169,000

    #11
    Originally posted by ИATAS206
    The Juice?



    i said great smile...like this

    Comment

    • ИATAS
      Banned
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Jul 2007
      • 36648
      • 2,509
      • 1,953
      • 50,835

      #12
      Originally posted by -pound4pound-
      i said great smile...like this

      :::Right Clicks, Set as Desktop Background:::

      Comment

      • Vasyl’s dad
        He said no rematch
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Mar 2008
        • 23510
        • 1,120
        • 1,945
        • 50,072

        #13
        The whole point of being "champion" is to prove you can and will knock off any challenger who wants the throne.

        Its only overrated when ones favorite fighter refuses to do so.

        Comment

        • GreatRubdini
          Interim Champion
          Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
          • Jun 2009
          • 933
          • 22
          • 13
          • 10,051

          #14
          When it comes to Joe Calzaghe, Sven Ottke, Zsolt Erdei, and Dariusz Michalczewski... then yes

          Comment

          • Spray_resistant
            Vacant interim regular(C)
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Feb 2009
            • 29804
            • 3,042
            • 1,598
            • 53,384

            #15
            Its all about who you beat and how good they were when you beat them.

            So to me wins of 4-5 elite fighters >>>>>15-20 defenses against some obscure mandos almost no one has ever heard of.

            Comment

            Working...
            TOP