tale of the tape: hopkins vs taylor

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • marvelous_TG
    undisputed champion
    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
    • Sep 2004
    • 797
    • 92
    • 43
    • 7,366

    #1

    tale of the tape: hopkins vs taylor

    look at the tale of the tape taylor is 10 times bigger then hopkins look at taylor's bicep measurements and forearms as big as mike tyson's and his legs are thick too, how does this guy make 160 pounds he got heavyweight measurements.

    http://www.hboppv.com/events/hopkins_taylor/tape.shtml
  • marvelous_TG
    undisputed champion
    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
    • Sep 2004
    • 797
    • 92
    • 43
    • 7,366

    #2
    watching the tale of the tape again and no way does taylor have 28 inch legs. i think they got his measurements mixed up with tyson's or something because no way his legs are that thick.

    Comment

    • too strong
      Banned
      Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
      • Jul 2005
      • 2
      • 0
      • 0
      • 13

      #3
      the bigger guy doesnt always win

      Comment

      • jack_the_rippuh
        I to your mom..
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • May 2004
        • 31700
        • 1,148
        • 627
        • 65,521

        #4
        But the bigger guy usually gets the girl, if you know what I mean.

        Comment

        • Truth
          Old School Member
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • May 2004
          • 18228
          • 578
          • 409
          • 30,780

          #5
          Bernard will figure out away to exploit all Jermain's weaknesses. Thats the type of fighter he is.

          Comment

          • marvelous_TG
            undisputed champion
            Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
            • Sep 2004
            • 797
            • 92
            • 43
            • 7,366

            #6
            Originally posted by too strong
            the bigger guy doesnt always win
            yeah i know, that's not what i'm trying to say, i'm trying to say it's impossible for taylor to be a tall middleweight and to have the same leg and arm measurements as tyson. and his legs do not look 28 inch too me.

            Comment

            • AintGottaClue
              What for that be
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Dec 2004
              • 6204
              • 221
              • 92
              • 12,939

              #7
              i think hbo put bigger number to hype taylor up more, that guy isnt thick at all he got skinny legs and arms kinda liek tarver

              Comment

              • marvelous_TG
                undisputed champion
                Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                • Sep 2004
                • 797
                • 92
                • 43
                • 7,366

                #8
                Originally posted by SturmRules
                i think hbo put bigger number to hype taylor up more, that guy isnt thick at all he got skinny legs and arms kinda liek tarver
                exactly what i was thinking heard it before that HBO puts up wrong measurements. and this in my eyes confirms it.

                Comment

                • AintGottaClue
                  What for that be
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Dec 2004
                  • 6204
                  • 221
                  • 92
                  • 12,939

                  #9
                  besides B-hop is just as big or bigger then taylor anyway, no way does taylor have bigger arms or legs then B-hop, he mgiht have the same size waist, but imo i think hopkins is the bigger man here but i could be wrong, isnt hopkins a bit taller then taylor also?

                  Comment

                  • jabsRstiff
                    ! ! ! !
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Jun 2004
                    • 8964
                    • 498
                    • 136
                    • 16,167

                    #10
                    they list Hopkins as 6'2".....
                    So, he's taller than Thomas Hearns ? C'mon now............

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP