why is everyone listening to arum..he did this same thing last time around

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Jack Napier
    Whores on Our Cul de Sac
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • May 2010
    • 8668
    • 812
    • 424
    • 16,030

    #21
    Originally posted by LARRYX P4P#1
    well you're not the one entering the ring..if floyd suspect mannys juicing he has every right to ask for extra testing
    right, and if Pac knows he's not juicing he has every right to tell Floyd to fuck off and watch him fight someone else

    Comment

    • AllEyesOpen
      Speech Cobra
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • May 2006
      • 5993
      • 195
      • 517
      • 13,538

      #22
      It's so funny how Pacfans are saying why doesn't Mayweather just accept the contract with 14 day cut off and 50/50 split, yet refuse to accept that this fight would have happened in March if Pacquiao and his team hadn't refused the very same thing. All they say is "that's in the past".

      Comment

      • infamous larryx
        Banned
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Jan 2010
        • 10881
        • 512
        • 265
        • 1,565

        #23
        Originally posted by AllEyesOpen
        It's so funny how Pacfans are saying why doesn't Mayweather just accept the contract with 14 day cut off and 50/50 split, yet refuse to accept that this fight would have happened in March if Pacquiao and his team hadn't refused the very same thing. All they say is "that's in the past".
        lol.....................................

        Comment

        • Boxingholic
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Jan 2010
          • 1004
          • 38
          • 0
          • 7,174

          #24
          Originally posted by LARRYX P4P#1
          blaming floyd is conveniant...explain why its floyds fault??ya'll blamed him last time as well
          Yes its all Flyods fault for requesting an unecessary OST that he never ask before from his 40 opponents. Pac agreed to his 14 days OST non sense and theres is still no fight. So whose interested to fight and who is not?
          Flyod should have fought Pac straight up like a real man, NSAC has already have there own blood/urine testing. Pac accepting Flyods 14 days OST makes Flyod looks worse even more. Remember all this OST is unecessary and no boxer has to abide by it, its all Flyod smokescreen if fight still doesnt get made.

          Comment

          • AllEyesOpen
            Speech Cobra
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • May 2006
            • 5993
            • 195
            • 517
            • 13,538

            #25
            Originally posted by Boxingholic
            Yes its all Flyods fault for requesting an unecessary OST that he never ask before from his 40 opponents. Pac agreed to his 14 days OST non sense and theres is still no fight. So whose interested to fight and who is not?
            Flyod should have fought Pac straight up like a real man, NSAC has already have there own blood/urine testing. Pac accepting Flyods 14 days OST makes Flyod looks worse even more. Remember all this OST is unecessary and no boxer has to abide by it, its all Flyod smokescreen if fight still doesnt get made.
            you're combining 2 different negotiations, Mayweather offered 14 day cut off in the first negotiation and Pacquiao refused, but it was Mayweather who ducked. Now Pacquiao is agreeing to an offer Mayweather publicly took of the negotiation table and if Mayweather doesn't agree then it's Mayweather ducking again. How does this make any kind of sense. Pac was responsible for this fight not happening in March, and if it's true that all points were agreed upon and Mayweather refuses then it's 1 an 1 for who tried to make this fight happen and who refuse.

            Comment

            • DontHitMyNuts
              Interim Champion
              Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
              • Nov 2009
              • 768
              • 38
              • 9
              • 7,200

              #26
              floyd was to blame the first time around for the OST anyways

              now he's to blame again for not signing the damn contract. wow, manny pacquiao the supposedly "easy work" opponent. could net him millions but he continues to display his masterful duckery

              Comment

              • Boxingholic
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Jan 2010
                • 1004
                • 38
                • 0
                • 7,174

                #27
                Originally posted by AllEyesOpen
                you're combining 2 different negotiations, Mayweather offered 14 day cut off in the first negotiation and Pacquiao refused, but it was Mayweather who ducked. Now Pacquiao is agreeing to an offer Mayweather publicly took of the negotiation table and if Mayweather doesn't agree then it's Mayweather ducking again. How does this make any kind of sense. Pac was responsible for this fight not happening in March, and if it's true that all points were agreed upon and Mayweather refuses then it's 1 an 1 for who tried to make this fight happen and who refuse.
                Because the OST is not necessary and it was the main reason the fight back in March did not happen. Its Mayweathers fault fight did not happen back in March and he even looks worse now that Pac agrees to his 14 days OST now. Dont try to play flip/flop that 14 days OST is not good enough. NSB has a pole back then about 14 days OST being fair and almost everyone agrees it was fair to get the fight made. Remember no boxer should abide to this non sense its not necessary.

                Comment

                • titan m
                  Interim Champion
                  Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                  • Mar 2008
                  • 964
                  • 63
                  • 262
                  • 8,677

                  #28
                  Originally posted by LARRYX P4P#1
                  blaming floyd is conveniant...explain why its floyds fault??ya'll blamed him last time as well
                  i blame pacquiao for the fight not happening in march, but this time if it doesnt happen i blame maywather. top rank obviously sent some type of offer to mayweather and whether it was a fair one or not, who knows but if mayweather didnt like it but really does want the fight you would think he would tell them his problem with the proposal. i hope mayweather is just being an ******* and making everbody wait until the last minute but if he lets the deadline go by and doesnt say anything how can you defend that?

                  Comment

                  • AllEyesOpen
                    Speech Cobra
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • May 2006
                    • 5993
                    • 195
                    • 517
                    • 13,538

                    #29
                    Originally posted by Boxingholic
                    Because the OST is not necessary and it was the main reason the fight back in March did not happen. Its Mayweathers fault fight did not happen back in March and he even looks worse now that Pac agrees to his 14 days OST now. Dont try to play flip/flop that 14 days OST is not good enough. NSB has a pole back then about 14 days OST being fair and almost everyone agrees it was fair to get the fight made. Remember no boxer should abide to this non sense its not necessary.
                    So the first fight didn't happen because Pacquiao refused a 14 day cut off, right? That’s Mayweather’s fault, not the fighter who refused.

                    Now If Mayweather refused the 14 day cut off, it's still Mayweather's fault. Do you not see your own hypocrisy?

                    If Pacquiao has the right to protect himself by implementing unheard of weight penalties that aren't the ones put in place by the commission, then why doesn't Mayweather have the right to protect himself from a fighter he believes is using PEDs with more advance testing then the commission has in place as well. Again, more hypocrisy.

                    Also i'm not saying a 14 day cut off isn't enough but Pac should have taken that offer when it was on the table.
                    Last edited by AllEyesOpen; 07-15-2010, 02:19 PM.

                    Comment

                    • infamous larryx
                      Banned
                      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                      • Jan 2010
                      • 10881
                      • 512
                      • 265
                      • 1,565

                      #30
                      Originally posted by AllEyesOpen
                      So the first fight didn't happen because Pacquiao refused a 14 day cut off, right? That’s Mayweather’s fault, not the fighter who refused.

                      Now If Mayweather refused the 14 day cut off, it's still Mayweather's fault. Do you not see your own hypocrisy?

                      If Pacquiao has the right to protect himself by implementing unheard of weight penalties that aren't the ones put in place by the commission, then why doesn't Mayweather have the right to protect himself from a fighter he believes is using PEDs with more advance testing then the commission has in place as well. Again, more hypocrisy.

                      Also i'm not saying a 14 day cut off isn't enough but Pac should have taken that offer when it was on the table.
                      stop wasting your breath..its pointless

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP