Valero,Gatti,Forrest

[Ray*]

Valero over Gamboa (130) Valero would be too quick and he would KO gamboa
Hatton over Gatti (140) Hatton would beat the 140 version of Gatti.
Forrest over Floyd (147) That jab would be in Mayweather's face all night long.

[rizkybizness]

jones vs calzaghe would be the annihilation of wales

[SPREAD]

Well usually in fantasy matchups you don't assume the shot version of the fighter

So why ask if it was a prime Gatti?.

[Bennett]

Forrest was a former WW champion, he beat Mosley worse than Floyd did. Annihilated a prime possibly on roids Mosley when Mosley was at hsi best.

do you really think thats news to me?

that was almost 10 years ago and Forrest was set in stone at 154. he was a big welter and when you get older its harder to make the weight.

ill say it again, no doubt in my mind forrest could not make 147 if he was still alive.

[rizkybizness]

So why ask if it was a prime Gatti?.

he answered himself with the post that you quoted

[street bully]

do you really think thats news to me?

that was almost 10 years ago and Forrest was set in stone at 154. he was a big welter and when you get older its harder to make the weight.

ill say it again, no doubt in my mind forrest could not make 147 if he was still alive.

My intuition tells me the OP meant prime for prime not shot vs prime.

[SPREAD]

Valero over Gamboa (130) Valero would be too quick and he would KO gamboa
Hatton over Gatti (140) Hatton would beat the 140 version of Gatti.
Forrest over Floyd (147) That jab would be in Mayweather's face all night long.

I like your calls i had Hatton and Forrest.

Gamboa i think would of beat Valero, Valero had too many flaws, Gamboa has his to but slightly more well rounded,faced slightly better competition and was a great amatuer.