Manny Pacquiao interview after 1st Morales fight - Video

[JK1700]

your thread kinda sucks because he did say it here:

That video is irrelevant because like I said before, Pacquiao NEVER mentioned a problem with blood testing until Floyd requested it. Larry Merchant asked him why it was a hard fight and he blamed getting cut, wearing the wrong gloves and shoes etc. He never mentioned blood testing as a reason for losing the fight, But now that he is being pressurised to take a blood test. He's desperate to find an excuse not to take it, An excuse that the public will accept. But I have exposed that excuse as false so it doesnt mean anything anymore. If the blood test had really weakened him then he would have mentioned it after the fight and not 2 or 3 years later.

[Safety]

Damn I remember how upset he was weeping. . . .

[ИATAS]

That video is irrelevant because like I said before, Pacquiao NEVER mentioned a problem with blood testing until Floyd requested it.

The video I posted wasn't that long after the Morales fight. Long before mayeather

[JK1700]

It is about Mayweather. You even mentioned him in your OP. Is he exempt from the blame if the fight is not happening? It always takes two to tango.

Pac's excuses for not taking it down to fight night is as lame as "he is from Puerto Rico" excuse. Lolz. Most in the boxing community are liars so I'm not surprised if you exposed or believe that you exposed something. Anyhow, the plot is played out. Let us try moving on until they both agreed on something. Ok.

Mayweather has to be mentioned because I am explaining why Pacquiao's excuses for a cut-off point and not having to take a blood test are complete garbage. Floyd has made some demands, But I believe his demand of OSDT was perfectly reasonable (Since Pacquiao's trainer has a history of steroids). What annoys me is that people blame Floyd for the fight not happening when Pacquiao (in my opinion) has held back the fight. Had he just agreed to testing then the fight would have happened by now, But everyone has their own opinion and I realise that alot of people believe what they want to believe rather than what is actually true.

[bcfc]

good point

[JK1700]

The video I posted wasn't that long after the Morales fight. Long before mayeather

I would like proof of that. But either way it's a failed argument from Pacquiao, After the fight he talked about gloves, socks and being cut. NOT a blood test, If he complained about it before Mayweather then it's just a pathetic excuse. Neither Pacquiao nor his daddy Mr Roach mentioned blood testing after the fight. Not once.

But now they come up with all these myths about him being "weak after blood testing" and "afraid of needles". It's just a ploy from Team Pacquiao to try and get an unfair advantage in negotiations (Cut off point).

[Young Money]

TS fail

lol

[JK1700]

If nothing is confirmed then there is nothing to speculate, for instance Paq and the PED issue. A cut off point of 14 days for Blood (urine can still be taken up till fight night)and a blood test after the fight is more then enough.

Let them wheel and deal, all we can do is wait.

But that's not an even playing field because if you have a cut-off point where you know you wont be tested then you can cheat and get away with it. Blood testing is extremely effective in detecting PED's but urine is not. Which is why fighters like Shane Molsey managed to take steroids because it didnt show up in the urine tests. Both fighters could be allowed 14 days but it wouldnt be fair because we already know that Floyd is clean, We do not know this of Pacquiao. Therefore a cut-off point is a clear and unfair advantage for Team Pacquiao.

[JK1700]

TS fail

lol

How did I fail? Please explain.

[tesla_power]

Mayweather has to be mentioned because I am explaining why Pacquiao's excuses for a cut-off point and not having to take a blood test are complete garbage. Floyd has made some demands, But I believe his demand of OSDT was perfectly reasonable (Since Pacquiao's trainer has a history of steroids). What annoys me is that people blame Floyd for the fight not happening when Pacquiao (in my opinion) has held back the fight. Had he just agreed to testing then the fight would have happened by now, But everyone has their own opinion and I realise that alot of people believe what they want to believe rather than what is actually true.

Now, where is the truth. Do we have proof? So far what we have are su****ions, allegations, etc... Your premise is that Pac is lying. It is your opinion based on a video. In which that video does not catch Pac saying "the blood test weakens me". Is that omission in the post fight interview nullify Pac's excuse now? I'm not sure but you are quite sure of that.

Now, NATAS gets you a contradictory video. You seem hell bent on discrediting that. What gives? Please stop preaching on something that you won't do yourself.