After his most recent blunder, will you ever take David Haye serious again?

[ColWallace]

Dave Haye was the twinkle in my eye... now he's just a hole in my pocket.

He's a contender for the Anthony Mundine Prize For Ducking... luckily for him Mundine is still around to claim it.

[The Hammer]

Don't you think a fight with Ruslan Chagaev is possible???

He'll likely leave that until 2011.

[maverock]

Actually Haye fighting Harrison now would make sense, I can see it will be marketed as The Battle of the British Frauds.

[Stone Roses!]

Dave Haye was the twinkle in my eye... now he's just a hole in my pocket.

He's a contender for the Anthony Mundine Prize For Ducking... luckily for him Mundine is still around to claim it.

You've got Mundine on your mind 24/7???

[Stone Roses!]

He'll likely leave that until 2011.

Didn't he say he'll retire after 2011???

He will never fight Wlad.

[edgarg]

He'll likely leave that until 2011.

Well, since he expects to retire in 2011, he'll likely leave it until 2012.

[bojangles1987]

Until Haye fights a Klitschko, he should not be taken seriously. He's nothing more than a joke.

[SimonTemplar]

Just to be clear, some of us in the UK tune in to see the Klitschkos fight. This is another nail in the coffin of Haye's credibility. Booth needs to go on a course or something, learn some basics about how to promote/manage a fighter. He is currently just stumbling from disaster to disaster, in terms of looking after Haye's future. I agree that Haye is ducking people, but he is also presumably being very badly advised by Booth. They just seem to exist in a bubble outside reality, telling one another that they are both wonderful and that everyone else is wrong.

[SkillspayBills]

I remember being the biggest fan of Haye when he confronted Wlad on an escalator to fight him like a man. My goodness how times have changed.

[SimonTemplar]

Sorry, the first part of my last post was supposed to be in answer to Panda, yesterday, saying that noone in the UK watches the Klitschkos. Being new to this, I made a mess of taking the quote from Panda's post and answering it. Apologies if I confused anyone by seeming to make a random point! Would anyone be kind enough to post a link to some instructions on how to respond to individual posts or sections thereof, please? I have looked but have been unable to find any instructions. Many thanks in advance.